Where do you rank Vince Young?
Where do you rank Mcnabb?
2007-02-10 09:04:29 · 16 answers · asked by lilcurly 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
vick- i'd rank him in the top 10. there is no doubt in my mind that he is very talented. he is by no means a west coast offense qb, but in the right system, he'd be amazing. it would also help if he had some other options than crumpler. it's very sad when your top receiver is your tight end.
young- i'd rank him in the top 10 as well. he doesn't have the stats of the top qbs, but he gets it done when it matters. he's really surprised me and i think just about everybody. i wouldn't be surprised if he's in the top 5 in a few years, possibly after next season.
mcnabb- i'd rank him #5, behind manning (#1), brees (#2), brady (#3), and palmer (#4). he's a great qb who has proved that he doesn't need a star receiver to be great.
2007-02-10 10:06:27 · answer #1 · answered by Dave C 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Vick is in the bottom 1/3 of the league by far. I wouldn't put him bottem 5 as there are some pretty crappy QB's out there
I would put Young around the middle right now just off of potential. His stats weren't great last year but it was his first year. He looks like he will be like a Vick with a better arm. I think Vick has proven that it doesn't matter how good you can run as a QB if you can't pass the ball it doesn't matter. Young's career will depend on how good of a passer he becomes.
No McNabb is by far the best QB of the 3. But he would rank at #5 behind:
1) Peyton Manning
2) Drew Brees
3) Tom Brady
4) Carson Palmer
2007-02-10 09:19:09 · answer #2 · answered by BAN 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i rank both mcnabb and VY over vick. in terms of QB, vick should be in the bottom half because he has been in the league 6 years and has had only 1 meaningful win against GB in the playoffs and that was years ago. Vick is a bad passer and has shown he isnt a good leader by flipping off fans and carry potlike substances.
mcnabb when healthy is an elite QB, one of the best in the league. VY is up n coming. he lead a horrible titans team to 8-8 in the AFC and he didnt even play every game, he already is a better passer than vick and better because i doubt vick can lead the titans to 8-8.
2007-02-10 09:08:38 · answer #3 · answered by what? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't rank Vick as a QB at all, he's a RB in my mind. Vince Young it's still a little to early to call, it would've been easier if he made the playoffs, Mcnabb keeps getting hurt, but he is definitly on the upper 15
2007-02-10 09:09:23 · answer #4 · answered by random bailey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How bout I just give you my list of my top 10 QBs
1) Tom Brady
2) Peyton Manning
3) Drew Brees
4) Carson Palmer
5) Marc Bulger
6) Vince Young
7) Tony Romo
8) Phillip Rivers
9) Donovan McNabb
10)Micheal Vick
*note that 2-7 are in fact all the Pro Bowl QBs
2007-02-10 11:29:55 · answer #5 · answered by Seth L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
VIck isn't even in the top 10 I'd say.
Young isn't even close.
McNabb is a good QB if he's healthy. Easily top 10
2007-02-10 09:11:37 · answer #6 · answered by ▪Ψ~ RZ ~Ψ▪ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vick and VY in the bottom 10, easily, with VY higher because he might actually live up to all the hype around him some day with good coaching. McNabb goes in the top 10, near the bottom of it, in large part due to his lackluster performance in his SB, but mostly due to serious questions about his durability and his viability as a long-term full-season starter...
LOL@at the user below who called Losman a stiff. He's better than Vick will ever be and will probably be a better passer than VY...
2007-02-10 09:10:22 · answer #7 · answered by Elminster 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I rank Vick in the top ten for RBs and the bottom five for QBs.
Young is in the middle of the pack, so next season should make for a better statement about his place in Tennessee.
McNabb is still in the top ten, but with Garcia's performance late last season, Donovan could slip a little further down the ranking.
2007-02-10 09:10:10 · answer #8 · answered by icehoundxx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are there fairly that many more beneficial mind-blowing qbs in the league or is the game basically replacing? I ask myself this each and each and every of the time... on the different hand I grew up watching football in the early 90s and there have been solid qbs 3 hundred and sixty 5 days in 3 hundred and sixty 5 days out.... yet I dont imagine todays qbs are more beneficial advantageous besides the undeniable fact that the game is determined as a lot as constrict defenses.... Stafford had a marvelous season... yet its in trouble-free terms one season... he performed through harm yet shall we see a body of work improve.. 2-3 seasons consecutively taking area in atleast 14 video games... =) Ryan Leaf grow to be the more beneficial advantageous quarterback..... hahahahaha jk
2016-12-04 00:25:15 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For star appeal...he's in the top 3...
As a QB he has a very strong winning %, but his team has not been a strong performer in the playoffs. He is erratic throwing, but has intangibles running that are difficult to defend.
Manning, Brady, Brees, Mc Nabb, Palmer all go ahead of Vick if your starting a team. Vince Young is a wild card...I put Vick ahead of Young right now...as he hasn't had much experience and teams have not "game-planned" for him much yet.
As a fantasy football performer, I usually rank him about 8th or 9th, though he finally performed like a top 3 QB last year in my fantasy league last year. I'd say I still rank him about 8th this coming year...with a new coach who will be letting him make more decisions.
In real football, I rank him lower...because I don't like his decisions off the field...which shows me that he's got flawed thought processes...his physical skills are exceptional...and I don't care if a QB scores passing or running...
ATL had lots of injuries on defense last year. His WR's are pretty poor...but his passing is sub-par..his escapability skills are #1 (despite VY). I'll rank him 15 overall due to his flaws for real football. Plenty of stiffs starting today... Rex Grossman, Brad Johnson, JP Losman, C. Frye, Plummer, Brooks/RAIDERS QB, J Harrington/Culpepper, Mc Nair (because of age), Leinart (who will be better soon), Pennington (because he's so fragile), C Simms/ Gradkowski, D Carr (gaffneys success in Philly shows Carr as a fraud), A. Smith ( not better yet)...E Manning
One can argue re: Tony Romo (erratic once teams found his flaws), Rothlesberger, Favre, Leftwich, P Rivers (who I like)...Cutler who is untested but looks solid.
I can't say that any of the players listed after Palmer in my top 5 have a better winning % (other than VY)... and ability to pressure the defense more than Vick does. VY could be better than Vick, but its so hard to tell since he hasn't played long at this level. Teams adjust.
In the end... I believe Vick is a solid option...but he must fit your teams organization and personnel. Up til now I don't think ATL has gotten as much out of him as is possible...and he's still got a very strong Winning %. His defense performs better when he is on the field than his backup who is a very good QB (Shaub).
2007-02-10 09:54:53 · answer #10 · answered by Idiot Savant 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋