If you owed the IRS even $1200, they would be up your butt
in an instant, penalties attached. Then they would take a
portion of your wages untill they are paid back.
Maybe we should think about doing that to Bush & Cheneys
salaries. I bet they would locate the lost money real fast.
2007-02-10 06:30:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Good point. Maybe we should pat him on the back for not losing 16 billion.
Does anyone realize what 15 billion dollars is? That's NASA's annual budget!
2007-02-10 06:26:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Must be that liberal media bias I keep hearing so much about.
Yep you can always count on the liberal media to treat trillion dollar debt and lost lives in Iraq as more important than the remarkable gardening qualities of the American President
2007-02-10 06:25:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
lol, I wonder if he sales that weed. Just joking, but I've said it before about him not being the appropriate president America should have. I'm sure he'd be a blast to hang out with though.
Krazy Libra
2007-02-10 06:24:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by krazy_libra_from_ac 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
interest losses were brought about through free commerce and the failed 2009 stimulus. keep in suggestions, i presumed jobs were created or kept? Now you're saying we lost jobs. Why can not you're making up your suggestions?
2016-12-04 00:14:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by england 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I realize that this question is really tongue in cheek. But if you really feel that he has good points, why don't you point them out.
If you don't feel that he has any good points, why didn't you just say so?
There are some who, regardless of the weed whacking, have taken your question seriously. Some people just don't get a joke.
2007-02-10 06:33:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by geegee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get your hand out of your pants, put down the wacky tabacco , and learn some facts before you post such stupid remarks. When you get out of sixth grade, come back and see us, without the Wee wee whacker hand in the pants.
2007-02-10 06:33:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by m c 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
or his ability to sexually assault other politicians
1. Joe Jew Lieberman
2. Germany's Chancellor
3. Saudi Prince
2007-02-10 06:30:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Taco . 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
youre right ...i guess we tend to overlook the important accomplishments of this man... i dont think weeds are the only thing hes wacking
2007-02-10 06:25:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Maybe its because the positive results of weedwhacking don't withstand the negative results of oh-say...declaring war.
Anyway--weedwhacking can't save us now!
2007-02-10 06:24:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋