inaction is usually due to compromise. The reason Congress works so well is because one idiot isn't making all the laws. Many idiots get together and decide on laws. With compromise, the laws get passed in a manner that makes them less restrictive. I like the system. I think we should do away with the president and have the speaker make final decisions when needed.
2007-02-10 05:54:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by fabrat1 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
All English professors take care of that putting a question mark on the top of a fact does no longer turn suggested fact right into a question? I even ought to bypass with the more beneficial deliberative and representative company. after all, that is precisely what the Congress is. Congress does no longer ought to act with the intention to finish their function as a representative authorities body. from time to time, I desire that that they had do basically no longer some thing. maximum situations, their inactivity saves the taxpayers money.
2016-12-04 00:13:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by england 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the Founding Fathers set Congress up to be slow. They figured the more they fight among themselves, the less likely they will start working together to restrict the rights of the People. And that system has worked for well over 230 years! Why mess with success?
2007-02-10 06:01:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In a way, it's true. Congress is blasting the President's Iraq policy, but you don't see THEM coming up with any alternatives other than withdrawing the troops, something that we simply CANNOT do.
2007-02-10 05:56:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by animefan95 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is my belief that inaction poorly serves all aspects of our surroundings. It is only by highly exposed congregations of procrastination and indecisiveness for means of person ell gain is this brought to light. If we would apply the same criticism to ourselves as we do to such conspicuous organizations and correct said grievances, we could lead by example in lue of hypothetical
2007-02-10 06:11:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by cameron m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
America does work better if the congress does nothing
They are not called the do nothing congress for nothing they are call the do nothing congress for doing nothing
2007-02-10 06:04:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, congressional inaction is a good thing. The more they deadlock and are unable to come to a decision, the fewer laws they can pass to infringe on our rights and spend more money.
Confusion to them all!
2007-02-10 05:58:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is my contention that we are more poorly served by an overactive Congress that spends far too much....
2007-02-10 06:04:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
its a known fact that democracy doesnt function well in times of crisis .. it works much better in times of calm ...
2007-02-10 05:58:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋