Are you pro-life or pro-choice?

Question

Having gave your answer, are there any factors or situations that could persuade you to make a different decision, even if it were only for one particualr circumstance?

Answer 1

ProLife! even if i was raped, or gotten pregnant by accident and was financially restricted to care for a baby I would never take that life. As petty as my reasons are, it doesnt compare to the life they would have had if I were suaded to go the other route. You can always give the baby up for adoption.

Answer 2

I am pro-abortion.

> are there any factors or situations that could persuade you to make a different decision, even if it were only for one particualr circumstance?
If having the operation endangered the life of the mother more than carrying the pregnancy.

Answer 3

Both "positions" are based on idiotic dogma. I'm neither.

If there are no unwanted pregnancies, there will be no abortions. Making abortion illegal will stop unwanted pregnancies like declaring sneezing is illegal will stop people from catching a cold.

When the causes of unwanted pregnancies are addressed - poverty, rape and incest, birth defects, or careless sex - then people can start talking about if and when abortion should be allowed.

To any women reading this: If you were raped, would you be happy if some godbot pharmacist decided that you shouldn't have access to the morning after pill? That has already happened in many places across the US, fascist godbots deciding that rape victims "deserve" to be pregnant.

One final point, and for the record: stem cell research DOES NOT involve "abortions", no matter how many times you are told that nonsense. People who claim otherwise are so ignorant as happens in the brain damaged or they are deliberate liars with a christianazi agenda.

Ovum that are used in stem cell research come from two sources:

1) Women who have no intention of becoming pregnant and _voluntarily_ DONATE them (ergo, the ovum would never have become a kid, it would have been flushed down the toilet naturally).

2) Couples who no longer need, want or can afford in vitro fertilization and they DONATE the ovum (ergo, the frozen embryos would never have been implanted and thus never become a child).

Unless you believe that Martin Luther crap about women who aren't pregnant are "guilty of murder", you'll agree that stem cell research is not unethical.


.
.

Answer 4

I am pro-life but I believe that some unfortunate exceptions that must be made, given society's messed up nature today are rape, incest,because these happen all too often these days and endangerment of the life of the mother must also be an exception. Not the QUALITY of life, mind you, she knew it was a possibility that she would become a welfare mother when she spread her legs, but her actual biological life. To the second part of your question, the only way I might change my answer is to make it even more conservative; in a perfect world we would actually watch what we do and have some morals and not think everything is our right,just because we want it.

Answer 5

I am pro-choice. I believe that the fate of a child in the womb should be solely in the hands of its mother and no one else.

If the mother decides she does not want the baby, then she should have every right to kill it before it's born. On the other hand, a woman who decides she wants her baby and will do anything to protect it must be allowed to keep it! Anyone who makes her miscarry should be tried for murder. If someone kills a pregnant woman, they should be tried for a double murder.

Lots of people hear "pro-choice" and they think, "pro-abortion." That's not what it's about at all. It's about choice, to keep or not to keep. Personally, I'd never abort my child. That's my choice. If a friend were pregnant and considering abortion, I would personally hope she would choose to keep her baby, but I would continue to support her, no matter what choice she made.

Answer 6

pro- choice, and I would only be against pro choice if the woman or women were using abortion as a form of birth control, then I think that it should not be allowed. If the women are just going out and having promiscuous unprotected irresponsible sex and getting pregnant, then no. Yet if they are that irresponsible, they don't need a child either.

Answer 7

Pro-choice.

Answer 8

Pro-life.No one has the right to kill an unborn baby no matter who they are.I believe all "Pro-choice" people are selfish to end a life of an unborn baby for all you know that child could grow up to discover the cure for aids and other incurable diseases.Also you don't know the aftermath of abortion emotionally.It is up to God if someone lives or dies not ours.

Answer 9

I am not pro-life nor pro-choice, I am against MURDER, period. Pro-choice is a deceiving word for abortion, abortion is another word for murder. This nonsense that life only takes place after birth is nothing but an excuse to kill the embryo and continue to have unrestricted sex. Souls inhabit the semen and when he finds a suitable place to develop (the ovum), he then becomes a human being.

Answer 10

I prefer life, but I don't think it's my place or the government's to make that decision for a woman. Rape, incest, health of the mother, pregnant teenageers - all valid reasons in my opinion.

Of course I would prefer that it not be used as a birth control method, but I would also prefer that if someone is going to have an abortion - for whatever reason - they get it done somewhere safe and clean, not at a friend's house with a coat hanger.

Answer 11

No excuse for murdering the unborn. My experience? An ex of mine killed our baby. What choice was I given? I would have gladly paid all the bills and raised him alone if necessary. What kind of sociopath mind set does some women have that it is better to kill than let someone else raise the child?

Down thumb me til hell freezes over. This is something I have to live with everyday. How would you like to know the remains of your child were in some bio-hazard garbage dump somewhere outside of Atlanta?