Don't get me wrong here, it is very sad that she died. But it was on the news all day...."Breaking News". Why is that breaking news? Why isn't something like the fact that we are destroying the only known plant that cures Leukemia (It's found in the Amazon rain forest. We are cutting down all the trees, so we are destroying it's environment) breaking news?
2007-02-10 05:35:34 · 2 answers · asked by Led*Zep*Babe 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Is it not more sad seeing thousands of children die from Leukemia? Because she is "famous", that makes her more special?
2007-02-10 06:05:52 · update #1
You are absolutley right. She was a model! Its not like she was helping starving kids throughout the world, or anything crucial to help out society. She let people take pictures of her! The right wing media wants to take any distraction away from the war and greenhouse effects, and run with it! I mean how many 'Breaking' stories do you see on Fox that have to do with the war or the environment, not many. Instead the wanna post pictures of a crazy astronaut lady that travelled cross country in a diaper.
2007-02-11 01:29:57 · answer #1 · answered by jeffreytucker79 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, she was a famous celebrity and was a multi millionaire. She starred in many movies/shows and she died so young. It's really depressing cause her oldest son, Daniel died 5 months earlier and now she dies. I mean, what's gonna happen to the baby? And, it's really sad seeing a famous and young celebrity die
2007-02-10 05:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋