If the world was going to end in 25 years, would global violence decrease or increase?

Question

If there was some force, beyond human control, that would kill off our species, what do you think would happen with the wars, violence, and even domestic crime?

Answer 1

Actually, I believe global violence would decrease. I think people would come together, to try and stop it, and make the last few years memorable, and safe.

Answer 2

I think global violence will increase due to international panic that the world would end in 25 years. (That is if the world knew that the world will end in 25 years).

Answer 3

You already know the answer.

Increase exponentially each year till Armageddon.

During various periods of human history, especially near the turn of a century, death cults and "the world is ending" cults proliferate. Wars and turmoil increase. Humans hate uncertainty and things they have no control over.

Answer 4

some people would panic and try to escape the pending doom, some would kill themselves, others would become religious and pray, but most would become hedonistic, enjoying the few remaining years and trying to forget.

Answer 5

well people would stop caring then the world would plunge into chaos then people would relise that we should make the best of what time we have left.

Answer 6

decrease because , without desir or money ,noi violence

Answer 7

nicely the way issues like education, well-being and residing standards are desperate are actually not continuously universally miraculous. it could be greater miraculous to assert that Sweden has the optimum well-being, education and residing huge-unfold between international places with the least disparity. additionally that connection isn't that needless to say illustrated, I propose, which got here first? Did they get their success because of the fact they grew to enhance into atheistic or did they enhance into atheistic because of the fact as quickly as they grew to enhance into efficient they now no longer mandatory faith to tell them a thank you to do employer? i'm an atheist myself, and that i say it incredibly is probable the latter. on an identical time as some religious human beings desire to assert morality and ethics come from their theory-approximately God or faith, they happen to be incorrect. The ethics do no longer substitute with or without God, a theory in God is an irrelevant very own decision. So as quickly as human beings know the ethics that lead them to efficient for their very own reward, then the place does God are available? Cognition refers back to the physique of strategies of studying. So, cognition inherently has to improve the longer humanity survives. We merely consistently have greater time to observe and learn. yet, the best judgment of religion could be inferred interior one existence time. i think of the surely progression of ethics had lots to do with it and a private theory in God did no longer have something to do with it in any respect. keep on with Mosaic regulation, beat your slaves as long as they do no longer die quickly, that's the want of God. hear to our ruler, that's the want of God. Kill your enemy, that's the want of God. harm the relics of our opposing church, that's the want of God. Love thy neighbor, that's the want of God. keep on with Christ and walk in the sunshine of the Lord, for the Lord is love, and that's the want of God. All adult adult males are created equivalent, with equivalent top to their very own liberty, for that's the want of God. Does it sound like the God section makes any distinction in the inference of the ethics or does it merely sound like human beings for the duration of historic previous theory their argument sounded sexier if God became on their part? Cognition has larger, because of the fact human beings have consistently had to earnings. God had no longer something to do with it.

Answer 8

it would increase