Also, how many countries has the USA fought in since the second world war?
Does anyone know the actual answer?
Or an estimated answer?
Serious answers only please.
2007-02-10
04:58:13
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Zag
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
To clarify, i mean civilians killed accidently, 'collatorally' or as intentional targets.
2007-02-10
05:33:16 ·
update #1
I'm not talking about other indirect killings caused by providing weapons to waring factions or caused by imbargoes.
2007-02-10
05:35:06 ·
update #2
You might need to clarify your question a bit. Do you mean civilians killed intentionally by the U.S. military, or civilians killed inadvertently by stray bombs or in the crossfire of a battle as well? Or does this number also include deaths from U.S. sponsored sanctions and embargoes? Do you mean countries the U.S. has declared war against, or countries whose military we've fought, or countries where we have fought against insurgents or helped to quell rebellions?
I would try to give estimated answers, but it would help to know exactly what you are asking.
2007-02-10 05:05:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by timm1776 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
What does it matter? You have a preconceived agenda and any answers that contradict that agenda will be ignored anyway. The question is prejudiced on it's face and was never intended to garner information. In any case it is a small number when compared to what other countries have done deliberately.
2007-02-10 05:18:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
needless to say no longer sufficient, on the grounds that we are nevertheless having hassle with maximum of them. You kill sufficient of them, and that they discover ways to bypass away you on my own. the U. S. of on the instant is the Rome of yesteryear. we are approximately to bypass down the tubes by using attempting to be political, as a substitute of sending in the army and hacking into small products (Or on the instant blowing into small products.) all of us who do unlike what we are doing. that's what made Rome great. The small products of enemy, that's. while they have been given so political that they could no longer make up their minds is what delivered them down. Blast 'em all! The devil is usual with of his very own.
2016-10-01 22:17:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't have these numbers, but for intellectual honesty, I hope you will compare your findings against the numbers who have died from their own internal conflicts, as well as looking at estimations of how many people the US has saved by interfering to prevent genocide.
2007-02-10 05:03:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by lizardmama 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
i dont have an actual count but a serious argument could be made that thousands died at wtc because of clintons numerous botched attempts or inaction with al qaeda during his eight year reign. its not just the action of the bush administration that needs to be conisdered here, its also the INACTION of the clintons. and that certainly is SERIOUS answering.
2007-02-10 05:03:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
In the thousands easily. Interesting you don't include WW2.
Hiroshima and Negasaki murdered thousands of unarmed women and children. The U.S has commited numerous attrocities.
2007-02-10 05:03:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gerry S 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
we havn't killed half as many as we did on the last 2 bombing missions on japan.
2007-02-10 05:08:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
0, 3, no, no.
2007-02-10 05:02:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋