Whether you vote for her -- or do not vote for her -- should have nothing to do with who she's married to.
You should consider whether she's a good candidate for the office or not. You should vote for her -or- not vote for her on the basis of HER experience, HER political positions, and HER integrity. You should consider whether HER WORD is good or not. Whether or not SHE is an oath/vow breaker. Whether or not SHE is competent and trustworthy, whether or not SHE has sufficient experience to be a credible president.
There is no oath breaker by association. Perhaps even, 'standing by her man' could be argued as evidence that she Keeps Her Promises.
You may find many reasons to vote FOR her --or you may find many reasons not to vote for her. BUT Bill Clinton should not be a reason to vote FOR, or to vote AGAINST Hillary.
2007-02-10 05:00:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by me 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would vote for her. Your question would be like me refusing to sell a handgun to the son because the father commits murder with one. I would not expect the son to not support and love his father while in prison for it.
The wedding vows say for better or for worse. Senator Clinton has made a personal choice to attempt and make her relationship work. One would think the conservatives would appreciate this. Instead I notice Guiliani is on top of the GOP approval polls, after affairs and two divorces.
Guess the hypocrisy never ends. ;P
2007-02-10 05:05:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by lordsomos 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
All married women are married to men who break their vows at some point or another, lol. Just because he couldn't keep his pants in check, doesnt' mean she's gonna have the same issues. Honestly, If Ihad to guess, I'd say she pretty much pulled the strings in that marriage!
So yep, I'd vote for her. Hell, I'd vote for him again if it was possible
2007-02-10 06:03:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chrissy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Actually I am not sure that in itself is grounds for divorce anyway. The adultry would be. A clergyman would most surely try and keep that marraige together, so why hold it against her?
Besides, there are plenty of other really good reasons not to vote for her besides that.
-Dio
2007-02-10 05:01:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by diogenese19348 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, she is an individual, they are not joined at the hip. Bill was a great prez, his affair was nobody's business but his. Are these the best arguments Cons can come up with against Hillary? Have you forgotten the mounting lies Dictator Bush keeps spewing? How convenient.
2007-02-10 05:02:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
She did not lie. Her husband did, and about sex. Who has not lied sex at least once in their lifetime?
Know one has accused President Clinton for lying to the people on the issues of the government. Ones like the war in Iraq, where thousands have been killed.
But our present President has lied repeatedly and so has our Vice President. It is well documented.
So yes I would vote for only the person who is running and their qualifications. Not their spouses record.
2007-02-10 05:03:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by DAVID T 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
She is a known liar just like her husband, so yes that makes her untrustworthy in my book. She is also a flip-flopper and the queen of Political Correctness - other reasons I cannot stand her. I would NEVER vote for her.
2007-02-10 05:05:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jenny A_331 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Since Laura Bush and Bush's dog are the only ones who still support him. Would you vote for a person who lies with every word from his mouth? I would not. BTW, Keep it up. Your hatred has made Hillary and Bill very wealthy. Bill now gets $250,000 for each 30 mins. he speaks.
2007-02-10 05:02:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
How shallow of you to even compare the two. They are two different people. Hillary will make an excellent president, just like her husband was. She will not be the failure that George Bush is because she is at least intelligent.
2007-02-10 05:00:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Two peas in pod. Hillary stays with her man because of what he knows on her. No would not vote for either of them
2007-02-10 05:11:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ibredd 7
·
0⤊
1⤋