Come on dearies, be honest!
2007-02-10 04:53:43 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Deary, you don't have Liberal friends.
2007-02-11 06:22:54 · answer #1 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Frankly I am hoping for Richardson to get the nod. I will take a moderate from either side. Clinton and Kennedy are not one of them. There isn't anybody out of the four you mentioned I would want for president. Particularly Clinton and Kennedy thank you.
And to be honest, Kerry would not have made a worse president then Bush, though Zippy the Pinhead would have been a better choice than either of them
-Dio
2007-02-10 05:09:52 · answer #2 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
those that extra Reid, Pelosi Murtha, Hillary, Feinstein, and Boxer are all on the money! yet to take off Gore basically because he's now no longer serving is stupid in reality, the guy is a fool! he's pointing out that the international Warming debate is over. no longer some thing will be added from the reality. His personal graphs educate that the warming tendencies are cyclical and guy’s moves do no longer coincide with the cycles. Yeah and that aspect about him getting a million/2 of the united states, LMAO! no longer in trouble-free terms is the different answer maximum ideal, in case you count number the type of states the went for Gore it grow to be 21 of fifty it is 40 2%. at the same time as the President is elected it is through the electoral college, see U.S. structure, ammendment 12 As for the anti-Semitic remark about Joe Lieberman, properly that grow to be basically advise. i love Joe. Oh, BTW thanks for asking this! i grow to be waiting to construct my contact record with some fairly cool cats in accordance to their solutions!
2016-12-04 00:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you put ALL the candidates running for '08 then you'd still be missing out on a full deck
2007-02-10 04:57:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore is an honorable man. He would make a great President. I agree.
Gore would not have prevented 9/11, but he would not have ventured into Iraq either. He would have caught Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan by avoiding the distraction of Iraq.
Gore would have continued the negotiations with North Korea that were started under Clinton, so North Korea would not have nuclear weapons today.
The Senate would have ratified the Kyoto Treaty by now had Gore taken office in 2001. We would be much closer to finding a solution to global warming.
Without the expense of the war in Iraq and Bush's tax-giveaways to the wealthy, the United States government would not have huge deficits to worry about. The economic situtation of the country would be much more solid. There would be less unemployment.
Seniors would enjoy lower drug prices under Gore than under Bush. Gore would allow Medicare officials to negotiate low prices with drug companies.
The victims of the Katrina hurricane would not have been neglected by Al Gore.
With Gore as President the United States would enjoy the respect and admiration of the world it once had. We would have more friends and fewer enemies.
Gore would fund "No Child Left Behind" and it would begin to be a reality.
Gore would not have torn up the Constitution, imprisoned supposed enemies without charge, or spied on American citizens. Everyone would have more freedom than under Bush.
The war in Iraq has increased the terrorist threat. By avoiding this war, Gore would have lowered the threat of terrorism. Resources would have been channeled into more useful programs, and fewer people would hate us.
Gore would devote time and resources to other pressing issues, including HIV/AIDS in Africa, relationships with Latin America, the struggle against increased drug consumption, human rights in Darfur, Third World debt, and immigration (among other things.)
2007-02-10 04:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by itsdabigbadwolf 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Yes they are playing with a full deck, and soon they will be dealing the cards.
2007-02-10 05:14:21 · answer #6 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no. Bush is not playing with a full deck
2007-02-12 06:43:20 · answer #7 · answered by JS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You put them all together and you would still only have half a deck.
2007-02-10 04:56:37 · answer #8 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Democrats always think they need something. Flown-in hairdressers, implants, rugs, frosting, friends in Hollywood, fake sincerity. Then there is one real guy-Lieberman-and you turn on him. I'm sure Hillary would get a new pair if it would help her get elected.
2007-02-10 05:06:47 · answer #9 · answered by Campo 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Dishonest career politicians totally out of touch with reality much less the people !!
2007-02-10 04:57:58 · answer #10 · answered by MR.Truth !! 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋