2007-02-10 04:36:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I don't think there's anyone by that name running.
Barack Hussein Obama has a chance, but will face challenges due to his lack of experience.
2007-02-10 04:45:01 · answer #1 · answered by Jeffrey 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
wow efficient names there. nicely i imagine united statesa. has already voted for a change even as united statesa. gave dems the seats in congress... so why wouldnt united statesa. be waiting for a change because it type of feels because the white men does not do an outstanding pastime... Bush purely has 39% of voters who back him which makes him the third worse president in US heritage. it should be efficient to have both a lady president or a black president. (oh and btw i'm white). yet i trust like hillary may have the added effective chance. which both one may be good imo in the experience that they are the superb ones for the area. If not then they don't choose it. i wager we are able to work out who does what and stands for what interior the subsequent months and three hundred and sixty 5 days...
2016-11-26 21:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think his inexperience will hurt him in the end. He may have trouble in the debates for instance. But he's very valuable. I think Hillary Clinton will be the nominee. I am hoping Obama will be her running mate, I think that combination would be unbeatable. It would be a great idea for him, get eight years (probably) of experience under his belt and then make his own run, he'd have a much better chance under those circumstances. If spelling his name wrong was a deliberate attempt to slander him it's a little too obvious for serious consideration.
2007-02-10 07:45:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, no. Things may change in a years time though. But as of right now I think Hillary Clinton will. I am a republican and would NEVER elect her though. She is like John Kerry. What I mean by that is this: Back in 02 or 03 she said that she had done her own research and thought that going into Iraq was a good idea. Now she thinks not. Dec of 05 she said, (along with some other prominent dems like Harry Reed, John Kerry, and Pelosi) that we needed a troop surge. Less than a month later she says its not a good idea. She, along with many dems, base their decisions on opinion polls and not their own true feelings.
Also, alot of the people from the old Clinton administration, Stephanopolous, etc., say that she has a mean temper and is quite volatile.
The problem with Obama is this, he has only been a senator for 2+ years. He has not sponsored one bill in that time. I believe that he needs some more experience before becoming president.
2007-02-10 04:53:32 · answer #4 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No one by that name has announced his or her intention to run for president.
If you're referring to Barack Obama, he is a very strong candidate. Anyone who is concerned that he lacks experience obviously didn't study the (meager) resume of George W. Bush, who had no meaningful experience in business or politics (governor of Texas hardly counts - the legislature meets once every two years!)
2007-02-10 04:54:10 · answer #5 · answered by Mama Gretch 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hell no, not with his ties to radical Islam, he will not even get re-elected as a senator. 90% of the population do not know who he is and do not want to. Whites do not like him, Blacks say get in line brother behind, Sharpton, Jackson, Browns hate him because he will build mexican wall and deport them.
2007-02-11 19:05:18 · answer #6 · answered by fds f 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I THINK HILLARY WILL WIN THE NOMINATION BUT NOT THE PRESIDENCY
2007-02-10 04:39:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That is not his name...republican.
2007-02-10 05:04:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no.
2007-02-10 13:20:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋