Your one smart person. I would vote for him again, again and again. He is the best.
2007-02-10 04:40:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by m c 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
Since the last election, people have seen how much Kerry really hates America. Even though Bush's approval ratings are down because people are ignorant, I don't think there are enough left-wing America haters to vote for Kerry.
2007-02-10 07:13:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The problem that plagued Kerry was the media. I know I know the conservative accuse the media of being liberal bias, but that is bull??it.
I would say one really needs to educate themselves on who they think would be the better prez. And by educate I DO NOT MEAN WATCH THE NEWS.
All the stories about Kerry were bs. No one took the time to research the candidate, I think Kerry would have been a really good prez.
Look at what bush has done for us, aside from the child tax credit, he has cut funding to rural police, has cut funding to pbs, (so those with kids, tape sesame street now, cuz its on the chopping block).
Bush is a rich mans TOOL. thats all. hes a tool!
2007-02-10 04:41:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by LoverOfQT 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
I never voted for Bush, ever. Anyone who would still vote for Bush needs a phychiatric checkup. The man has lied continuously on every subject. The most obvious are those about Iraq. There were no weapons of mass destruction, no Saddam connection to al-Queda. Bush & Co. chose only intelligence that supported their intent to invade Iraq, no matter how unsubstantiated was the source. If you don't believe me, read the news. Even many of the right-wing pundits are changing their tune.
2007-02-10 04:47:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by mindshift 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
We really didn't have much of a choice the last 2 elections I mean, come on!
Bush vs. Al Gore who didn't even win his own state?
Bush vs. a self-admitted war criminal in jew-boy john Kohn (changed name to kerry to sound irish)
Bush was not a good choice, but Gore and Kerry were TERRIBLE candidates and were unelectable. Too much clinton baggage as well.
2007-02-10 04:48:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
likely not. i'd have a not uncomplicated time believing a persons' not burned out after 8 years as President. even though it surely relies upon on who he became operating adversarial to. i does not have voted for him in '04 if the democratic get collectively had nominated each person except Kerry.
2016-11-26 21:26:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush. For the same reasons I voted for him in 2000 & 2004.
2007-02-10 06:41:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bush, and i would continue to vote for Bush if it was between them in 2012
2007-02-10 05:14:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
John Forbes Kerry
2007-02-10 04:38:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by greek302 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
I would vote for Kerry, like I did the first time. What kind of idiot would vote for Bush again? Especially with the way the country is looking now? Common sense....
2007-02-10 04:37:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
5⤋
I agree with you. I would pick the lesser of two evils since Kerry wouldn't know how to better job than Bush which is pretty sad. And the Botox thing creeps me out.
2007-02-10 04:38:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by Dr. Richards 2
·
2⤊
4⤋