It may not matter to some but believe me when children grow up they care. It does matter. If woman were more careful who they spread there legs for they would not end up with such rotten men and babies would not be born out of wedlock!
2007-02-10 04:23:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by bobblehead 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
I think society is coming around to accepting the idea that children are being born out of wedlock....but that doesn't make it right. Children need both parents. A mother can't take the place of a father, and vice versa.....the parent that thinks they can do the roles themselves is not only wrong, but a little full of themselves.
I grew up without a father, and there are things about me that will be forever different because of it. My two boys have been forced to spend time away from their father, because he is in the Army, and even short amounts of time away from him have a great impact on them.
Wedlock, or similar commitment to eachother and the child are important not only for the emotional health of the child, but also will go to show the child how to interact later in his/her own loving, committed relationship.
2007-02-10 05:07:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by salemgirl1972 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Does it count number? The crumple of the nuclear kinfolk - oftentimes the most important aspect of any civilization, from historic days to well-known situations - is in trouble-free terms the starting up of the crumple of society. Marriage isn't sacred anymore - that is an excuse to have a huge get mutually and bypass on a honeymoon. it is incomprehensible, and frequently leaves people more beneficial empty and lonely interior than in the previous. Boyfriends, girlfriends, mistresses, previous marriages, exes, one-evening-stands - what number relationships can someone have lately? you want to imagine of this from the newborn's attitude. I paintings with youngsters, from those in my personal native land to an orphanage in South Africa. did you understand how emotionally detrimental it is for the newborn? i understand a touch female who lives with her mom, and her daddy needs no longer some thing to do with her. also, her mom is continually dragging new boyfriends into the domicile. as a effect, she is puzzled, indignant, and feels betrayed. She has her personal relationship complications - she unearths it confusing to believe and not in any respect chooses the right boyfriend. nonetheless, once you're asking about no matter if that is alright to have youngsters and then get married? i wager if both mom and father are mutually and love the newborn, i do not fairly see a issue. besides the undeniable fact that, you need to comprehend it is not in any respect the case. lots of the children born out of wedlock do no longer stay with both mom and father.
2016-12-04 00:06:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that babies need both their mother and their father, and that being a single mother is hard work. I think that babies deserve a chance at a whole, in-tact family. While marriage is no guarantee that the family will stay together, it's a lot harder to break up a marriage than a "dating" relationship, and therefore people try harder to keep a marriage going, a lot of the time.
While I admire single mothers for their strength, I feel sorry for their kids, that they don't have a dad, and it is certainly not a path that anyone should consciously choose. I barely survive some days, and I have a husband who is an amazing father, and all the support in the world. I can't imagine doing this on my own.
2007-02-10 04:00:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Amy 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I have two kids by the same dad twelve years apart. When I had my first son, we weren't married and I really didn't care. In fact, no one that I can recall ever really cared except my dad who was old school and thought we should be married. However it wasn't his choice. So finally we got married last October and I had my second child in November. So what does that all mean - I don't really know except both kids have two parents who care, they both have the same last name, and they are loved. I don't think it really matters anymore in this day and age. Maybe to some people, but as long as the kid is well taken care of that should be what truly matters :)
2007-02-10 04:41:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michaela 4120 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
some people seem to think that because god said so that marriage is the only way to have a happy life. what they seem to overlook is that a piece of paper and a bunch of words does not make much difference in the long run. I know many people who are single parents and the happiest, best parents a child could want, their children are wonderful as well. On the other hand I know many married couples that are absolutely miserable, their kids too, because they don;t believe in breaking gods vow and getting a divorce, even when that clearly would be the best outcome for EVERYONE involved.
A piece of paper does little. love, understanding and respect whether married or not goes a lot farther.
2007-02-10 04:05:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
At the very least, a child needs the legal protection of a marriage and the structure (or at least a semblance) that it provides. It takes an enormous amount of effort, not to mention the costs, to raise a child. It's far from perfect or a guarantee, but if you want children, I'd say that marriage is still a better option.
2007-02-10 04:04:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it doesn't matter. of course, having two loving parents is always what's best for the child however, that is not always the case. these days it seems like there are more children born out of wedlock. but as long as the child is receiving lots of love and being well taken care of, it doesn't matter.
2007-02-10 04:03:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Maddie and Jacobs mom 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's all up to your beliefs. You can't let others opinions bring you down. I grew up believing that you should be married first. Now that I'm older I believe that things are different for each person. I still believe that marriage can be the best, but at times it might not be. It all depends on your situation, and like someone else said, as long as the baby gets the love and care that it needs.
I am now 4 months pregnant, and my boyfriend and I have been talking about marriage even before becoming pregnant. Now my parents are encouraging (almost to the point of pressuring) us to get married ASAP. That is our plans, but we don't want to rush just because of them, and because of the baby. I am 26 and I told them that I appreciate their concern and support, but we are adults and need to do this on our own. We want to make sure we are 100% sure first. Which in our case will involve couples counseling. Just so we can make sure we are ready. We may get married before the baby is born, or after, we aren't sure right now.
Make sure you are in the best situation for you, and don't let others bring you down. Just take care of yourself and your baby.
2007-02-10 04:09:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by curious 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
It used to matter to me when I got pregnant at 16 I married the father I didn't want my child called a bastard but the man I married ended up being an alcoholic/drug addict/violent man he was controlling and I would never ever advise my child to get married under those circumstances so to me it is not always better.
2007-02-10 04:00:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by fluttergirl2004 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's really not a big deal to most people. The people who usually still think it's a huge problem are older people.
Today, it is so common that it's almost insulting when a person assumes or suggests marriage just because a person is pregnant.
I'd like to think that we are coming into a more accepting time where people are able to remove their pre-judgements and accept people for who they are, regardless of their own personal belifs.
2007-02-10 04:54:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by WORLD FAMOUS 3
·
2⤊
1⤋