English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"In the 4 years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001….It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East which, as we know all too well, affects American security.

-- October 10, 2002 Senate floor before her vote in favor of authorizing the president to go to war in Iraq.

2007-02-10 03:48:02 · 13 answers · asked by mission_viejo_california 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

She's a liberal; therefore, she must fall into one or both of two categories -- dishonest or naively ignorant.

It's unlikely, but possible, that she doesn't know she lies. Maybe instead of manufacturing the rhetoric, she actually believes it.

2007-02-10 03:54:37 · answer #1 · answered by Rob D 5 · 4 1

Well, if she had been given the truth, just as the rest of the Congress was not, she probably would have said something much different! Much of the information given to them were bald faced lies and Bush knew it, like the yellow cake from the Niger. Ambassador Wilson had already debunked that! That is why Cheney authorized the leak of undercover CIA operative Valarie Plame, Wilson's wife's name! As far as I am concerned that is Treason!

If you are able to read, just read today's paper as what some evidence existed that Bush KNEW were lies when he gave them to Congress!

If i remember correctly, all you Republicans voted for the Tonkin Resolution allowing the buildup of combat troops in Vietnam, another lie! What do we call you? "Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty Nine. Every one of them a son; a brother, or a father, a husband, a cousin, a lover, a neighbor, a friend. Fifty Eight Thousand Two Hundred And Twenty Nine boys brought home in boxes.

How do you Republicans justify your vote?

2007-02-10 04:06:05 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1 1

Hilary is a worn out whore with about a 175,000 miles on her. This woman has already been bought and sold. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.

2007-02-10 03:52:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Clinton is a conservative (Very Conservatives Democrat) and conservatives flock to a protectionist in times of fear and will even give absolute power to the leader over the people to feel safe. I would say most were fooled right after 911 but you are missing the point Clinton is a Senator and her job is to represent the people in her district so if the people supported the invasion in the beginning but now think they were fooled and do not, it is her job to bring that will of the people to Washington.

2007-02-10 03:58:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

via fact while your party is bereft of something comparable to unique theory, and there are not any genuine ameliorations between the two applicants you have on philosophical grounds (different than that Obama isn't, a minimum of on the exterior, as potential-hungry as Hitlery is, as though that have been achieveable), all you have left is finger pointing. Hitlery's definitely everyone seems to be attempting to throw as plenty airborne dirt and dust from the sewer wherein they stay to be sure what's going to stick, for her finished argument is "All politicians are corrupt; i'm basically purportedly smarter than something." nicely, once you do no longer comprehend that your husband's getting a hummer interior the Oval place of work, I heavily question your intelligence.

2016-11-03 01:55:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because what she says now is a all based on made-up facts too. If she can be so confident in her statements then and backtrack why would anyone believe anything she has to say again. It is obvious she rides with the wind.

2007-02-10 03:55:46 · answer #6 · answered by Tink 5 · 2 0

Hillary took a stand as all of us did. We were all flying the American flag at the time.

2007-02-10 04:54:15 · answer #7 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0 0

Typical lib politician,flip-flop,flip-flop,flop--flip.
Say one thing and do another.
Her husband ran on a middle class tax cut and gave us the biggest tax hike in history.

And some people want to put them in charge of our health care ?

2007-02-10 03:58:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hillary and the prior administration were all privy to this information long before Bush even had a thought of running for President.

2007-02-10 03:51:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Hillary Rodham Clinton has not denied her involvement in authorizing the war in Iraq; however, she has also accepted her blame for its abysmal failure. Further, she has stated that it was a tragic mistake, based on false intelligence reports and an inflated belief in self-importance from the White House.

2007-02-10 03:52:15 · answer #10 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers