Been happily married 16 yrs..Hubby is 42 and can last around 20 minutes or so during sex and yea he can totally satisfy me..So my question...Is 20 minutes or so pretty good or not very long for a guy to last?
2007-02-10 03:47:42 · 9 answers · asked by sally d 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
I personally think if it suits both partners then it's fine. If your both satisfied don't sweat it. If it becomes a problem work on it. Good luck and keep having fun.
2007-02-10 05:00:19 · answer #1 · answered by 84cj 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm close to his age. Sometimes I last and hour and she is begging me to stop. Sometimes I last 5 minutes and she is nearly unconcious with pleasure.
If you're satisfied, then there is no problem. 20 minutes is a good amount of time to last, but if the partner finds it to be too much, then it's a problem. Otherwise, forget about the time and just have fun.
You shouldn't be watching the clock anyway.
2007-02-10 13:05:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ok wow bold question first off im glad you are bold enuff to ask it. there are so many stereotypes about hw long a man can last and even if you ask porn actors they usually have to think of something really really really disgusting not to "do their thing" within 30 mins. and on top of it its not how long but how well the time is if a man can rock your damn socks and make you smolder in only 10 mins than thats impressive...yeah its funn to have things more than once a day and do things romanticly and with evereything (including foreplay) have things last for a hour of pure romance but normally (the everday normal thing) things dont last too long and get shorter in age if he last that long and rocks your socks...HELL YA THATS GOOD!!!!!...hes average and most are of course you'll get a flaunter every now and then saying that 20 mins isnt nothing and longer is better or some fake crap, but in all truth... its a good way if things last too long it makes you think why... ya get me... and well simply put almost a half hour isnt bad!!!!if he is skilled enuff to get you in 20 mins then you got yourself your sexual match. dont be afraid to spice things up every now and then and prolong things. it can be romantic and fun (and if people got things like that all the time the worth of it would be gone.)well it looks like your happy and thats enuff. who cares what other people think he can satisfy you! thats all that really matters.if he did things in five mins but could satisfy you entirely would you really care that it only lasted five mins, it just would mean he knows his wife and how to do her right. (no pun inteded) he'd have skill!!! most men dont take the time to get to know how to completely satisfy their woman. be glad that yours does... many woman would be glad to be in your shoes.
hope i answered what you were looking for
2007-02-10 13:31:09 · answer #3 · answered by patricia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say 20 minutes is in the norm. I really do not think time should be a real factor if you are both plesased with the end result.
2007-02-10 13:11:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you're satisfied what's the concern for time. do you want quality or quantity?
If you're looking for longer encounters, make sure that you get several interuptions from ringing phones, barking dogs and kids knocking at the door - that will do wonders for the time.
2007-02-10 13:00:58 · answer #5 · answered by stupido#1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is for a 42 year old
2007-02-14 11:05:23 · answer #6 · answered by sweetgranny06 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are totally satisfied it should not matter if it was five minutes.
2007-02-10 23:35:31 · answer #7 · answered by Moni B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20 minutes? I'd say you're lucky.
2007-02-10 21:12:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
19 minutes more than mine. LOL
2007-02-10 14:48:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋