Is this the most difficult/insane question one can ask?
2007-02-10 03:41:42 · 14 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I would definitely choose to be a serial killer. I would only kill people who are bad for society, like other killers.
2007-02-11 22:33:03 · answer #1 · answered by possessed Regan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not think it is that difficult because the question is rather broad. Saying you rather commit suicide but that doesn't mean you would want to do that right now or even how you do it. Many people in pain and on the verge of death commit suicide and you cannot say it is the right/wrong thing to choose.
A serial killer is also a broad statement for example the person in the prison who "kills" the prisoners on death row they have killed enough people to be considered a serial killer but does that make them a bad person?
This question is not simple but it is broad so no matter what you choose it does not mean you are right or wrong.
2007-02-10 03:53:31 · answer #2 · answered by stevebass260 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not much of a choice is it?! If I had to choose then I'd rather kill myself than several (since you mention serial killer there would be multiple victims) innocent people. This life is pretty short. 70-100 years or so. The afterlife is eternity. I would rather spend eternity in Heaven than in Hell. Murderers go straight to Hell. It is an unforgiveable sin. Yes it is also wrong to take your own life but I believe it is far more heinous to take the life of another.
Luckily I will never have to make such a choice!!! I choose not to kill anyone thank you very much!
I'm sure there are more difficult/insane questions but this one is definitely right up there!
:)
2007-02-10 04:13:10 · answer #3 · answered by amp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Serial killer. It'd be a challenge, and I'd always have the option of committing suicide later if I got caught, etc.
2007-02-10 03:49:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not that crazy a question.
There are political regimes in which a very similar dilemma faced people - either join a murderous, senseless regime in a murderous rampage, or be labeled as one of the enemy yourself and be executed.
Hard to imagine, I think I would rather die than compromise my most basic morality, but would I have that kind of courage if the question came up for real?
2007-02-10 03:47:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think serial killers have a defective gene ,like an addict ,he knows the rush is there,so like any other addict you continue. Ihad a bad drug problem. One day killyour self or get help. But as fair as killing for fun,I would commit suicide
2007-02-10 03:54:08 · answer #6 · answered by jeff0264 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My first thought is kill myself. But could you chose who you were serially killing? Most serial killers have a victem profile. If you were serially killing people that most people feel are so warped,sick,evil, etc.that we shouldn't have to share the planet with, that is a "victem" profile I might be able to live with.
2007-02-10 04:00:11 · answer #7 · answered by Linda L 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd committ suicide because I wouldn't want to hurt others.
I am alittle selfish though :\, it's a hard one for me. I won't lie!
It is a very hard question to answer but a good one.
2007-02-10 03:50:02 · answer #8 · answered by Kaykoura 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i couldn't kill anyone and if i commit suicide i'd probably hire a hitman to kill me but then thats not committing suicide. or i'd find a way that is a more peaceful way to die but i still probably wouldn't do it. i worked to hard to get this far i'm not gonna mess things up now or later. sorry i can't answer this question.
2007-02-10 05:29:34 · answer #9 · answered by chocolatekisses 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would be a serial killer and make it look like you commited suicide.
2007-02-10 04:10:28 · answer #10 · answered by jkk k 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋