NO and NO.
I have no idea why Republicans just regurgitate junk they hear without verifying it. There were A LOT of congressional members that voted AGAINST military action in Iraq. More House of Rep than the Senate but quite a few.
They would have you believe ALL the Democrats did minus 1 or 2.
FYI, Howard Dean is irrelevant to your question. He was NOT and never has been in CONGRESS. He was a governor of a state, not a federal congressional member.
2007-02-10 04:22:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
As chairman of the National Democratic party, Mr. Dean has chosen to aid the Democratic party in an executive managerial role.
2007-02-10 11:43:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by david42 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
The "WMD" story was brought up by DEMOCRATS, promoted by DEMOCRATS, until they wanted to run for office.
Here is what they said, see link.
2007-02-10 11:50:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe because he is against protecting America?
Why Does Democrat Party Chief Disagree With Democrat F.D.R.?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoDB_Ilgx1MXekPBUNNOySrsy6IX?qid=20070131123407AAUcuHk
2007-02-10 11:47:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by a bush family member 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhh
2007-02-10 11:54:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Howard Dean embarrased himself out of the last race. Do you really want him back?
2007-02-10 11:41:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by meathookcook 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think he should run, he was one of the most entertaining figures last time. Besides I want to see if one of those veins in his forehead will actually pop when he starts yelling again.
2007-02-10 11:43:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by snowball45830 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
If you are a democrat you should be happy he is not running. He is a political disaster.
2007-02-10 11:40:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Buffman316 1
·
3⤊
3⤋
This is why
http://youtube.com/watch?v=KDwODbl3muE
2007-02-10 11:43:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Abu 5
·
1⤊
1⤋