2007-02-10 02:59:33 · 24 answers · asked by pretender59321 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not a valid question, and really has no bearing upon anything.
However, I do like to give this smartass answer:
Don't worry, she'd be very efficient in screwing all 300 million of us Americans if she's elected president.
2007-02-10 03:27:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can personally guarantee that all Hillary bashing will be of this sort! Like all neo con hate mongers, all you have is the politics of labeling and hating and personal attack. You will NOT hear any discussion of Hillary's positions on issues or her voting record or anything relevant or factual. Conservative hate will not be enough to derail Hillary's march to the White House. Hillary is a former republican (neo cons - sometimes it helps to read and actually know what your talking about, hate will not carry the day) and is NOT a liberal any more than her husband was, and this is why she will get business, media and MIC (military Industrial complex) support, and why she will win in 2008!
2007-02-10 03:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by chucklogic 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Is that your rationale for electing a president? Is George W. Bush satisfying our nation? I think not. If a person's sexual life influences your vote, then you need to mature a bit before voting again.
2007-02-10 03:11:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
the 1st area of your question is the two irrelevant and moronic. As for her potential to steer a rustic, the only instantaneous one she might have is to deprive the country of certainty, morality, dignity, liberty, safety and something this is worth scuffling with for.
2016-12-17 06:42:36 · answer #4 · answered by pfarr 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am looking for a representative of the people`s will not a father figure that thinks they know best. And by-the-way a woman can keep you just as safe as a man from terrorist, just in case you are having problems evolving.
2007-02-10 03:10:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
If your definition of "satisfy" is of a sexual nature...
Good God!!! In no way do I want that woman, Comrade Clinton, to even attempt to "satisfy" me!
YUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKK!!!!!!
2007-02-10 03:11:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Apparently Bill couldn't satisfy one intern. He had to use a cigar.
2007-02-10 03:08:18 · answer #7 · answered by DisIllusioned 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush couldn't satisfy his wife because he's a psychotic self-hating closeted homosexual.
2007-02-10 03:06:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Using your logic then Laura Bush must have a drawer full of vibrators.
2007-02-10 03:12:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm more worried about her handling foriegn powers and keeping us strong and safe,
I doubt any lib can or will do that.
2007-02-10 03:17:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋