Think of all the problems we could leave behind, or would we just take them with us? I'm assuming that we would make Bush 2 stay on earth?
2007-02-10 02:22:52 · 5 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
LOL.
That's funny, because Bush DOES have access to saucer technology. As a member of the Shadow Gov't, he is very aware of that fact. But we won't see any benefits from that tech until we can force them all out into the light. The CIA and the NSA are only two 'arms' of this shadow gov't, which is controlled b[qw089ty [ [awiodfuy890QY2U]-0mxm]9-Ue]fx]p,ecCMORCV'S
2007-02-10 02:30:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wouldn't we become those aliens in "Independence Day" then. Going from planet to planet, using up all its natural resources.
I say stay put and blast the whole Bush family into space.
2007-02-10 02:28:22 · answer #2 · answered by apple juice 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All of my flying saucers broke when they hit the wall
2007-02-10 02:29:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you have hundreds of trillions of dollars, to make that happen. Then i'll be up for it. But, how would we make trades? If we can't then it'll be hard to get food, growing and making food on the moon, or anywhere else for that matter would be extemely difficult.
2007-02-10 02:26:51 · answer #4 · answered by D.O... 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We wont let you leave without Bush.
2007-02-10 02:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋