English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Even if you don't believe in cover up and inside job.Wasn't it a great failiure in US security?Would America want to show the whole world how their defenses were dubed?If it's public other enemies also know.The best protected air space and a plane stays in the air for hours and is allowed to attack the pentagon?What if that plane had been a nuclear missle during the cold war?Would it have been so easy for the USSR to blow America of the map?

2007-02-10 02:07:09 · 21 answers · asked by justgoodfolk 7 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

no it's not, it's far fetched to think we got the full story.

2007-02-10 02:27:21 · answer #1 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 5 2

Well, I've known for a long time that the coal deposits on the planet would be impossible if the earth had not completely flooded at one point. Although just the other day I was talking to a few guys and they had come up with a theory, that the Earth originally had a layer of water in the atmosphere, with a hot house effect or something, blocking out all radiation and stuff, then one day this layer for some reason or another descended on the planed flooding the earths surface, then slowly soaking into the Earth enough that all the continents emerged above the new ocean. This theory does kind of come up with a scientific explanation for the ages of the people living before Noah's time, living hundreds of years, who's to say that in ideal conditions a human couldn't live that long. You're right though, it does sound a bit far fetched getting 2 of every animal on, but if you believe in God, why not believe that he commanded the animals to board the boat and not eat each other the whole time? The only thing I struggle to comprehend, is that it talks about behemoth (at the time of writing meaning four legged beast) with legs like cedar trees, apparently referring to dinosaurs. Although due to the lack of the hot house effect, the dinos would die out, leaving thousands of fossils in those sediment layers that could only be explained by a flood. Until someone actually proves carbon dating reliable (which to be honest I doubt will ever happen) this is what i would accept as logical. The thing that can't be scientifically explained is how the animals were gathered and restrained from eating each other. Although, one other thing to add to this, is that the book of Genesis was scribed by Moses as God told him the story (leaving one point of mistranslation) into Hebrew, then it was retranslated into English for modern times, so there has to be a margin of error, the differences in the Hebrew language now and then for example, it can't be the same as it was. Also I wanted to add that what boomn4x42 said earlier: "To belive that the bible is the word of God, is just as ignornant as to believe there is no God at all. Read the bible, think about the words in the bible, consider the words in the bible.... but follow the path your HEART tells you to follow." It's kinda the basis that make Christianity different from every other religion, think about how a lot of the New Testament is only letters from the leader of one church to another. It is what they felt in their hearts was right.

2016-05-25 00:37:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nobody was duped. It was a matter of time. look at the resistence Bush faced while trying to change things after 9/11. Imagine how difficult this would of been before 9/11. The powers that be in this country would of stone walled anyone whom attempted to usurp our freedoms in an effort to prevent 9/11.

Their is plenty of blame to go around but the ultimate blame falls upon our political system. Anybody that attempted to prevent 9/11 would be voted out of office and other politicians would have said how could you possibly try to take away our freedoms all in an effort to gain political power.

WE are in sad shape!!!!!!

The terrorists have exposed our weak spot and exploit it to this day. We may very well choke on our own freedoms as a result.

They know American political thirst for power outwieghs what we believe is best for our nation.

Their nation is Islam so whatever they do including suicide is what they believe IS best for their nation and very well may mean the destruction of our economy and the downfall of America.

Get ready to be in long soup lines if we don't get our head out of the Democratic donkey.

2007-02-10 02:33:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, certainly a failure, and they allowed it to happen with intent ! They certainly played their part, and I could care less about the enemies within that thinks they were innocent. Government is NOT innocent !!
Show me the evidence that a PLANE hit the pentagon ? Yes, its easy to blow America off the map. All their soldiers and weapons are in other countries !! Sorry to say, but there is no safety in America, and an ignorant government in the white house..seen a joke go around about oil and running low with Garfield, and it tells you where all the oil is, and says, but all of our dipsticks are in washington dc ! LOL ,,true ,,so true.

2007-02-10 02:33:13 · answer #4 · answered by Kathy 2 · 1 2

Just for a little fun type in aon center Los Angeles and you will find out that the building was constructed in 1973 and 5 floors where burned and completely gutted by fire . Not only did it not fall but it is still standing and has been renovated and fixed .Several earthquakes sinse have failed to bring it down . Built in the same style of architecture as the world trade towers and around the same time . Same steel certification and plant that provided the world trade towers .
Just thought you might want to know that .

2007-02-10 02:57:38 · answer #5 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 2 3

No, if you look at the videos of the Jet that hit WTC 1 and compare them to photos of a 767 and a 777 you will see that it was a 777 that hit the WTC 1 and not the 767 of fight 175.

2007-02-10 02:15:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I had no idea that 9-11 was an inside job till years after I started doing intense research for the truth. I think that is what keeps the masses from believing it was an inside job.....fear of the truth. They feel better just believing a lie. For those who don't think it's possible...all they have to do is read the Northwood Papers. It's a fact that Cheney had complete control over NORAD on 9-11, and told the military to stand down. I just think it is nothing more than fear that keeps people from accepting the truth. I wish they would get over it...and get mad!!

2007-02-10 02:17:24 · answer #7 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 2 3

Yes it is far-fetched, and shameful for people to attack our security, and here is why.

American has always been an "arms wide open" nation. We have always accepted students from other lands. We are hospitable to strangers, and we don't go around looking for people to want to repay our kindness by destroying our landmarks and people.

Those terrorists had visas, albeit some expired. They rented places to live and enrolled in flight school. Lived normally, below the radar.

I venture to say there are students in our universities with expired visas. Should we round them up and send them home? Is that what our government should be about?

How can liberals bash our poor security before 9-11 and also bash the Patriot Act? Total hypocrisy. We cannot have it both ways.

2007-02-10 02:14:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 5 3

Well, the only remaining questions for me concern the black boxes of the planes. A black box is designed to survive the most extreme conditions, and all kinds of explosions and high-speed impacts.

I find it *very* strange that the black boxes of both planes were completely destroyed, and yet somehow the passport of one of the highjackers was recovered in a relatively undamaged state mere hours after the attack.

2007-02-10 02:15:03 · answer #9 · answered by langdonrjones 4 · 4 2

There are many unanswered questions.

The 9-11 Commission Report was a whitewash. The investigation was led by a Bush political hack and they refused to even ask some of the most important questions.

The report is full of contradictions. Obviously someone is lying.

It is very frustrating to see the mainstream media accept this worthless report as fact and label anyone who questions it as a conspiracy nut.

If there was nothing to hide, why has so much been covered up and deliberately obfuscated?

2007-02-10 02:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

You have some very scary questions. I suppose if a group is so dead set for destruction, they can accomplish a certain degree by planning and surprisse.

2007-02-10 02:20:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers