2007-02-10 01:30:38 · 11 answers · asked by Andy 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
I think its a good idea because of two reasons. The first is there will be an injection of cash for new players and the second is Liverpool will become noticable in the states which will led to more money from merchandise. So it means that Liverpool should be able to compete with utd and chelsea
2007-02-10 01:40:32 · answer #1 · answered by hidawallace 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it matters who owns the team, American or British, as long as the players play well. There was a lot of fuss about Man U being owned by an American but look where the team is now. Plus whoever sold Livrpool to the Americans probably made a lot of money in the deal.
2007-02-10 13:24:51 · answer #2 · answered by Ruud_Kaka_Niko_Fan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad, not just because they're Americans but because they know zilch about English football, one of them was being interviewed and said ' One of my sons knows all the names of the Liverpool players because he has a football game he plays on the computer'. Yeah right! At least Egghead at West Ham seems passionate about football.
2007-02-10 09:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dunno. What i understand is that you Limeys can not stand to have a Yank personal one in each and every of your human being worthwhile football communities. so that you moan and whinge about it. quickly the Saudis will personal Liverpool, and y'all will have a good time. satisfied days are the following again, as Liverpool is now no longer owned through those poor Yanks, yet those marvelous Saudis. more beneficial advantageous than one in each and every of those slimy handed Yanks, eh? Ask and also you shall receive.
2016-12-04 00:01:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its all about the money blood!! Its a good thing. plus we dont want arabs controlling europe not with the bombing and terrosim going on one love liverpool fc
2007-02-10 02:41:55 · answer #5 · answered by reory35 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bad because they will more than likely sell off the rights to naming the new stadium it would be a shame to lose anfield etc and good because we need the money to be able to compete realistically
2007-02-10 01:36:39 · answer #6 · answered by zerocool 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont care they will never match Manchester United on or off the pitch
2007-02-10 01:47:42 · answer #7 · answered by niceguy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
its gotta be good for them they are no longer in debt and they are gonna get a bigger stadium and they will also have cash to spend.
2007-02-10 01:37:02 · answer #8 · answered by Deano™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GOOD...! Plenty $$$$$$$$$$ to spend.
2007-02-10 04:20:07 · answer #9 · answered by Merovingian 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It makes absolutley no differance to the way they play football. they will still be rubbish.
2007-02-10 01:36:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋