English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

want to never read another NY Times, WAPO, LATIMES, etc etc paper or watch a MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etcetc television show?

2007-02-10 00:32:43 · 16 answers · asked by mrfeelsgreat1 1 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

I gave up watching most of those channels and reading those papers years ago. They are only for those who pine for a world that matches the Heaven they don't believe in. If you go back to the Vietnam war and the Tet offensive, those same media giants you list called it a majopr defeat for American Arms. The worst defeat in Military history since the Revolutionary war. The fact is that it was a major victory by our soldiers,over an enemy that attacked by surprise, during a truce they asked for (their holiday), and resulted in a major loss to their forces, and they held no ground taken in the attack for more than a few days. At the end of which they were tactically and logistically worse off than before. They did gain a major moral victory though by reading our papers and listening to traitors like Jane Fonda.

2007-02-10 00:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by mark g 6 · 0 2

So according to MrFeelsgood, the liberal biased media is all pervasive, making people want to leave Iraq before we're done... doing WHAT exactly?

But Mahal then says everyone watches conservative Fox News and all the "liberal" news services are on their way out, since no one watches them, pressumedly.

So, which is it?
Is Rush Limbaugh a drug addict and hypocrite or not?

Did Newt Gingrich NOT dump his first wife while she was dying of terminal cancer, or did he?

Did Bush NOT say he would capture Osama bin Laden "dead or alive" and promised to "smoke hm out his hole"? HAS bin Laden been captured? Or was he just a convenient scapegoat to use to get us into Afghanistan? Or is Bush protecting him because his dad works for the bin Laden family?

As much as you might like to, you can't have it both ways, so which is it? Is Fox News the most popular propaganda in the US or is the liberal media?

Or are this just more "liberal' propaganda?
Can't the Neos even agree amongst themselves? Ok I dont even want agreement, how about logic and consistency? I will be SO glad when we expose the Neos for the fascists they are.

2007-02-10 00:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I believe that your premise is flawed, thus the question really should be, "Should we withdraw from the failure to successfully occupy and stabilize Iraq due to poor planning and even worse implementation", or should we only listen to Fox News continue with their fabrication that we have any possible chance to "Win" the Iraq disaster? It required far too long for the American media to awaken to the enormity of this administration's failure in Iraq, to the seriously flawed planning, and misrepresentation, and now that 65% of Americans are voicing their dismay and objection to the continuation of the War, the media is finally revealing the truth. Now it appears that only the delusional really believe that there is any chance for "winning" in Iraq.

2007-02-10 00:45:43 · answer #3 · answered by Sailinlove 4 · 2 0

There's nothing liberal in the media. Hasn't been for years quit repeating that tired old meme. The media is a corporate whore and the corporations are conservative to the point of jingoism. BTW Cut and Run was the talking point from last year, isn't there a new one yet?

2007-02-10 00:37:57 · answer #4 · answered by Captain Mid-Nite 1 · 3 2

I haven't watched those stations or read any of those rags for years. I am filled with so much happiness every time I do hear that they are having to lay people off. I'm sorry people are losing their jobs, but the media has become like roaches, way too over populated.

2007-02-10 00:39:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

study the object you published. Estrada became no longer nominated to be a suitable court docket Justice, he became nominated for The Federal Courts of Appeals. here is the way it is going -- the Democrats attack Republican nominees and the Republicans attack Democratic nominees. no longer probable a race factor.

2016-10-01 22:05:11 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

bush gives the media plenty of fodder and you do not have to be liberal to observe incompetency,lieing,corruption and graft that follows the republican congress and the bush administartion like a mushroom cloud...the only news organization that dont follow this is fox news ---what else is new

2007-02-10 00:48:09 · answer #7 · answered by pokerplayer16101 2 · 3 0

All of the above mentioned papers are on the way out. It will be some years before it happens, but all of them are losing circulation, and the liberal news networks are actually losing to cable. People would rather pay to see FOX than get liberal news for free.

Says something about our tastes, doesn't it?

2007-02-10 00:35:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I am not much on the news except local.World news has gone haywire and ,daily is predictable and as entertaining as the sun rising.

2007-02-10 00:41:23 · answer #9 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 1 1

Yes, or listen what the rest of the world is saying.

2007-02-10 00:36:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anthony F 6 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers