It seems that when I support Bush, I get a violation email. Is this fair?
2007-02-09 21:29:01 · 9 answers · asked by americanmalearlington 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You can, I thought, only get violation or abuse emails for naughty stuff--see all the abuse categories. I would email the Yahoo Community Guidelines and Protest their "VIOLATION" emails. I did. But no, to your question, you should not be violated because you support an issue or a person!!! I would fight back. Copy and paste your answers to a word file so you can forward your emails to the abuse department. There is a phone number but for the life of me I can't find it. Anyone have the Yahoo customer service number for this guy??
Others just tick your answers about to discourage you from answering! Don't let "them' win!
2007-02-09 21:36:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
1- I would fight and argue with Randy Orton,I would kick his @ss,i'm serious,he doesn't scare me. 2-I would apologize to him and say that he is a big teddy bear 3-I would tell her to finish showering and then get out of the shower,i dont shower with others,especially other females,im straight. WQ- Wrestling skills- I think Gail Kim is a better wrestler than Mickie James. Gail Kim is very well rounded,she does technical,high flying and submission manuevers and she has a lot of experience. She is one of the best female wrestlers that the WWE has ever had. Now,Mickie James is a great wrestler,I jus think Gail Kim is better. I think Mickie James is more charismatic and has better mic skills,but Gail Kim is better. WQ2- Eve Toress- I think she is better in the ring than Kelly Kelly,i mean Kelly Kelly just does a bunch of flips which she botches and she is terrible,Eve really tries in the ring and she has improved,I think Layla is a close second to Eve.
2016-05-24 22:05:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree that it does seem that there is a political agenda on this website generated by the owners (Yahoo). I guess the alternative is to post elsewhere. I don't agree that this should be the purpose here and I may well decide to leave this forum, too, because of this. The censorship here is too strong, but in the wrong ways. I understand censoring the perverts here, but not people who are expressing their political points of view.
2007-02-09 21:39:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I have the same problems with conservative issues.
It no surprise that this happens as most rich easy money people are liberals.
I do not use Google anymore when I found out they are biased towards Christians. SHOCKING to me.
It is NOT FAIR that Yahoo does this, as this is being biased. I believe most of the hires are politically liberally oriented, as I said most easy-money types become liberals to avoid being envied (A Jack Wheeler principle).
Why shouldn't their hires not be the same???
They probably have monkeys on their desk to remind them not to believe in G*d or the Bible.
2007-02-09 21:59:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush sucks but you should have a right to your opinion, at the top of the page there is a link to the forum, you can protest your wrongful deletions there. If they are not violations of TOS or community guidelines you can get the points restored and they will not count against you.
2007-02-09 21:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
It sure does not seem fair. There should be equal rules for both sides, but that is what you get with the p/c police.
2007-02-09 21:38:40 · answer #6 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wel if you support Bush then you should ask for an augmentation of your lust cause.
2007-02-09 21:38:41 · answer #7 · answered by Jose R 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Funny, I have the same problem. Is Yahoo biased?
2007-02-09 21:36:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No its not fair..but neither is being a soilder in a unjust war fair to the soilder...so hey..life is unfair...get use to it.
2007-02-09 21:33:40 · answer #9 · answered by gqmighty0072001 1 · 2⤊ 7⤋