English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Examples.
when there are men only places it is called sexual discrimination but when there are women only places it is called sensitization to women and woman power.

When a man is shown in media being kicked in the groin by women it is laughable but do you really know what serious emotional and physical consequences are there ?

Suicides,domestic violence,crimes all are perpeterated by men is the mindset and there is no woman on this planet ready to tio do anything about it WHY?

2007-02-09 20:43:07 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

6 answers

You seem to know the real answer already. Feminists push for more privileges for females at the expense of males, and they're quite happy to ignores disadvantages that men suffer (such as their pain being comical) since it doesn't affect their "campaign."

The problem is that there are few men who stand up to this. We've been socialized from an early age to "protect" women. Unfortunately, this is a relic of an earlier time when women who acted like ladies deserved men who acted like gentlemen. It's pretty obvious that women aren't holding up their end of the bargain anymore, so I'm eager for the day when enough men wake up and start doing the same.

2007-02-13 06:28:05 · answer #1 · answered by Steve 4 · 1 1

Joe i comprehend what you propose I went via the CA kin courts in ninety one-ninety 2-ninety 3 attempting to get equivalent rights to my children I wound up dropping because my ex spouse made many pretend allegations about abuse and the courts are biased adversarial to men. i ultimately had to flow back to AR the position the courts are nevertheless biased yet not as undesirable. CA had the gall to label me as violent because I fought interior the Gulf conflict. definite protecting oppressed human beings led to my personal oppression. And the liberty men like me insured to feminists were taken from me. If femmes were for equality they could be picketing outdoors of courthouses in the present day to get equality for all. although the actual shown actuality that this has been happening for decades is information that they purely choose women human beings to make the most of their movements. And that's the humorous area they whine it quite is so not uncomplicated to reinforce a baby by technique of themselves yet they are those who had the dad bumped off. in the experience that they could in basic terms open their eyes they could see that shared parenting is a thanks to flow. the mummy may get day without work and their may be no choose for baby ransom {help} funds or perhaps an business enterprise to implement it. yet they don't choose that they prefer their exes to wade through so as that they shop the children faraway from their dad as a lot as obtainable and take each little thing they could.

2016-11-26 20:57:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

first of all there is no equal rights for men we are now the ones fighting for our rights .

for instance curves for women OK that motto there I find to be sexist and sexual discriminatory towards men in genera

2007-02-09 20:55:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

You appear to be ranting somewhat so I will limit my response by suggesting to you that two things need NOT be identical to be equal. Let's begin with a simple mathematic construct: 2 plus 2 EQUALS for. They are not identical YET they entirely equal, correct? Excellent, Now, let's examine the concept of equality as a political idea: here is a definition taken from the Stanford University Encyclopedia of Philosphy:

1. Defining the Concept
‘Our first task is therefore to provide a clear definition of equality in the face of widespread misconceptions about its meaning as a political idea.

The terms "equality" (Gr. isotes, Lat. aequitas, aequalitas, Fr. égalité, Ger. Gleichheit), "equal," and "equally" signify a qualitative relationship. ‘Equality’ (or ‘equal’) signifies correspondence between a group of different objects, persons, processes or circumstances that have the same qualities in at least one respect, but not all respects, i.e., regarding one specific feature, with differences in other features. ‘Equality’ needs to thus be distinguished from ‘identity’ -- this concept signifying that one and the same object corresponds to itself in all its features: an object that can be referred to through various individual terms, proper names, or descriptions. For the same reason, it needs to be distinguished from ‘similarity’ -- the concept of merely approximate correspondence (Dann 1975, p. 997; Menne 1962, p. 44 ff.; Westen 1990, pp. 39, 120). Thus, to say e.g. that men are equal is not to say that they are identical. Equality rather implies similarity but not ‘sameness.’

2007-02-09 21:34:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I think the femnists believe in ineqaulity. In my religion Islam men and women are eqaul.

2007-02-10 07:41:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

They want more rights and benefits and will whine about it if things are equal.

This is why I laugh in movies when a woman gets beat up.

2007-02-10 02:01:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers