The immovable part is smashed to pieces.
2007-02-09 17:53:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It bounces off and goes around following the path of least resistance.
Seriously, though and logically, if such a thing as an irresistible (unstoppable) force exists, then no object is immovable, and vice versa. It is logically impossible to have these two entities (a force that cannot be resisted and an object that cannot be moved by any force) in the same universe.
Because if an object is unstoppable, then there can exist no entity that can stop it (such as an immovable object), otherwise, by definition, it is no longer an unstoppable object. On the other hand, if an object is immovable, then there can exist no entity that can move it (such as an unstoppable object), otherwise, by definition, it is no longer an immovable object.
2007-02-10 01:58:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by azhat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the unstoppable force keeps trying to move the immovable object, but the immovable won't budge so it keeps on trying with no luck...it's like those cartoon characters who kep on trying to run through a wall, but go no where because the wall won't budge, but they don't think about going around and it's a never ending task...yup, just like that
2007-02-10 01:57:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by bearluver_05 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask Chuck Norris.
2007-02-10 01:54:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by tashley235 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My girlfriend gets pregnant?
2007-02-10 01:53:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither are possible, but its a cool idea. im thinking a lot of noise
2007-02-10 01:52:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umm either nothing......or a huge mess......take your pick.
2007-02-10 01:55:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mintjulip 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
a big mess
2007-02-10 01:52:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by 0821l_4a8^#y$855 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
somethings gotta give?
2007-02-10 01:54:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sartoris 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
they both explode!!! :-)
2007-02-10 01:53:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋