I think there is a big reward if you can find it and prove how you did it and prove that you did not alter or fake anything.
2007-02-09 17:37:31 · 3 answers · asked by Tamara 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
The Hubble Telescope would probably be the closest.
The telescope is able to lock onto a target without deviating more than 7/1000th of an arcsecond, or about the width of a human hair seen at a distance of 1 mile.
2007-02-09 17:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by azhat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alter or fake? The moon landing was all make believe to you? The fact that we landed on the moon is pre-requisite to the advances we have made in cable tv and the internet and PCs! If you want to spend the time and money, the government controls all satellites that are powerful enough.
2007-02-10 04:21:11 · answer #2 · answered by rdappa 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This subject has been discussed ad nauseum. a 1 ft wide object on the Moon would need a telescope with a 1.5 km wide aperture to resolve, in addition to the 5 km effective focal length. This large a telescope is not physically realizable.
2007-02-10 01:47:43 · answer #3 · answered by arbiter007 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋