I've always supported their charity, but I question their motives now. Why must they invade everything? Isn't it enough already?
I find them using celebrities makes me respect the charity less, which is unfortunate, because I have always believed in their convictions.
I hope that they will tone down the celeb-inspired (like they read the questions or answers) Yahoo questions.
♠ ♠
2007-02-09 15:04:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♠Gotham♠ 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I've seen Lucy Liu and Alyssa Milano's questions. The Angels and the Charmed ones joining forces...lol...I've clicked the link...so I would say more exposure=more likely to support charity
2007-02-09 23:56:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wht Hare 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I tend to avoid ANY establishment that advertises to the point of being annoying. I don't care if it is a charity or a product, if it annoys me, it does not have a place in my life, unless I have no choice in the matter.
2007-02-09 23:04:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Katykins 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
HA! I saw the one for Lawrence fishburn (born??) and I had a laugh becuase his expression is more like "I don't care about these kids!" Nothing against the man good actor and all but come on.
2007-02-09 23:04:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I support UNICEF, but NOT because of them. They annoy the heck out of me, and are so obviously shallow and pretentious.
2007-02-09 23:02:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jess H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That'll Be The Day
2007-02-10 00:09:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't been on here too often. Which ones are they? Are they the featured questions at the front?
2007-02-09 23:02:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It shows me they are desperate to make their charity well known.
2007-02-09 23:02:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no difference, I think it's a good charity.
2007-02-09 23:03:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by glasgow girl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do plenty for people.
2007-02-09 23:02:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Someone who cares 4
·
0⤊
0⤋