So many peoplr took advantage of a weak sweet girl, obviously a very low self esteem and depression. We are all guilty for buying trash mags and watching trash and not reaching out to such an innocent child. She didn't even go to freshman year of H.S. H K Stern is wuckin guilty!
2007-02-09 14:50:56 · 13 answers · asked by maggee 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I think so to. Anna was in the later yrs of her life very messed up. Yrs of drug abuse had taken it toll and honestly why would u marry someone who wasn't coherent and that u could not have a proper conversation with? Also all the rumours that he gave Daniel the drugs that killed him. There is also the money issue, He is a lawyer and he could hide a crime as well as find loopholes in the will, unless he helped her make one up, She would have done whatever he wanted and she would have trusted him. I do not believe that Stern is Innocent!
2007-02-09 15:20:21 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Booh♥ ☺☺☺☺☺ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm with you.....#1) How much does it take to pay off a Bahamian official?? NOT saying that is what happened - just supposing - theries here...
#2) Daniel and Anna were both heavy into drugs - right? Well - riddle me this Batman - why did Daniel die at 20 and Anna lived to the ripe old age of 39???
#3) Why is it taking so long for the autopsy??
#4) Why is the paternity not being moved up to today??? Who is being paid to stall??
2007-02-09 14:58:51 · answer #2 · answered by snowdrop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I won't go so far as to say he murdererd them both...but your right, something doesn't add up. Just about every interview done with her in recent years, she's been obviously messed up for quite sometime...hence the slurred speech and erratic behavior. And yet Stern has always been by her side. If he LOVED this woman, WHY in the WORLD did he not get her the help she so desparetly needed? He was too busy defending her actions to the media, brushing it off as if it were no big deal...when in all actuality it WAS a big deal. Whether it's proven he's guilty of murder it remains to be seen....but in my eyes the man is guilty as sin by not trying to intervene as a decent human being and allowed her to continue her downward spiral to self destruction. Just my 2 cents.
2007-02-09 15:33:46 · answer #3 · answered by Blonde Ambition 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Abraham knew that God had promised nations from his seed. This was a test of faith and obedience to God. Both Abraham and Isaac trusted in God enough to go through with it. Jesus later would be born of that bloodline so Isaac's life was really important and never was meant to really be sacrificed. Sacrifice is no longer necessary since Jesus was the sacrificial lamb. New claims regarding this now would be false and not of God.
2016-05-24 19:48:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, this actually fits the pattern (MO) of Gary Condit, and his "Disposal Service For Hire," I am beginning to suspect. You know, young & beautiful "Sexual Embarrassment to high ranking politician" dies - And poison/drugs are part of it all... It looks like a "Serial killing?"
And some sap is set up to be the "Obvious" fall guy.
This pattern goes from the recent Ipswich, UK, prostitute murders to Lacy Peterson to JBR.
And the investigative authorities never "Solve the case."
Remember Chandra Levy?
2007-02-09 15:01:50 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Plus he has that smarmy up to no good look about him and he displayed a controling and posessive behavoir on the E AN show.
not to mention the other 400mil reasons.
I cant wait for the results in a couple of weeks
2007-02-09 14:58:35 · answer #6 · answered by smoothopr_2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've thought about it... and you never know. But, what if he isn't the child's father.... he has lost it all, no more money for him. Unless, of course.... he helped Anna make her will. Hmmm. From what I hear, he is so sick, he won't even eat.
Look what I found: http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/article/stern%20lashes%20out%20at%20mums%20murder%20claims_1011053
2007-02-09 15:04:44 · answer #7 · answered by Stormee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well your theory is more entertaining...........but there is no evidence to support such an opinion and hes probably way down the line as far as suspects are concerned...........
sounds wicked and classic evil, but not very logical
2007-02-09 15:00:15 · answer #8 · answered by SpinKick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree 100%. that's the first thing i thought of too!!! he's a lawyer, he has the knowledge and resources to help her kill herself and make it accidental, especially now that he's supposedly the dad of the baby that could inherit some $400 million!!!
2007-02-09 14:56:57 · answer #9 · answered by prettyme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why he want to kill anna? if she dead, her ex-boyfriend could ask dna test and if stern not proven to be child's father, so he be losing lots of money. he need her alive in order to not get dna test.
2007-02-09 14:55:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋