2007-02-09 14:32:40 · 27 answers · asked by GEL 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I think he should have retired...
2007-02-09 14:35:02 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Smoothie, aka Mr. SmartAss 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
King Booker sucks, bring back Stevie Ray and the Harlem Heat
2007-02-13 20:44:14 · answer #2 · answered by Saint Luke 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, I don't think Booker T. is a loser so much....he just has a bad habit of coming up with "good ideas" (note the quotes) and running with them for a few *Months* too long.
_King of the Ring_ may be a sweet premise for this sort of thing, but it is hardly the be-all-end-all. It isn't _Wrestlemania_. For example. Point is, his "let's see how funny I sound talking like Har-reh Pot-hah" gimmick stopped being funny like three months ago.
But then again....what else can he do now? He's *won* that "World Title" (which was the old WCW title, at least in terms of design and layout back in the day) six times now. Now that he's done that he can't go back.
Just saying. (because personally, I *dug* his scissor kick and his heavy-kicks, heavy-handed offense, suckers)
Thanks for your time! :)
2007-02-09 22:47:52 · answer #3 · answered by Bradley P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
King Booker is a loser, Booker T wasn't
He's just gotta end this King Booker Gimmick =\
2007-02-09 22:38:55 · answer #4 · answered by Rain. 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Booker is great but way past his prime. He was in his prime back in WCW. Now, he is having back problems. He is struggling in the ring and is noticeably slower. He has had a great career with 5 WCW titles and a long awaited World Heavyweight Title. I say he could retire honorably any time, of course, he is ok to stay around has well.
2007-02-09 22:49:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No.
I loved booker T, but King booker sucks.
2007-02-09 22:41:36 · answer #6 · answered by [RKO Lover♥] 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Booker T should not be a "king". he should have been a "Jester" for the king. He is just a joke! I mean the scissors kick, what kind of crap is that? Oh please!
Notice that I never capitalized king LOL
2007-02-09 22:38:47 · answer #7 · answered by izzitonme 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he was better when he was Booker T but when his name into King Booker, he just became a no-one!!!
2007-02-09 22:40:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he isn't. He was wonderful in WCW, just think of his best-of-seven-series against Chris Benoit. These matches were wonderful. He had two matches on one PPV, winning the WCW TV Title, and from this day on, this man has my respect. I do not watch WWE, but in his WCW days I can clearly state that he was not a loser, but a great athlete.
2007-02-09 22:44:26 · answer #9 · answered by iMPACT Player 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For thinking he is "King Booker" when he is not all of a good wrestler, i think he is a loser.
2007-02-09 22:39:26 · answer #10 · answered by K-Deeznuts 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a wrestler?
As a person?
As an entertainer?
Is there something he has done to anger you?
You do realize that "wrasslin" is choreographed don't you?
To answer your question, I actually think he is pretty good at his craft. He puts on a good show!
I hope that helps.
2007-02-09 22:45:59 · answer #11 · answered by Mr realistic...believer in truth 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋