Well, even if you're a true scientific follower, even some have come to the conclusion that there IS a higher power at work. Even Charles Darwin ended up a Christian, or at least a believer in a higher power, at death (he's buried in Westminster Abbey in London). It's totally up to you, but I feel it's pretty obvious that something could NOT have spontaneously formed out of something else.
2007-02-09 13:11:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by mandirae23 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Do I don't think they can co-exist. Your question is classic god of the gaps. God exists on in areas of scientific ignorance. But the thing about science is that it works. It turns stuff we don't know into stuff we do know. 200 years ago everybody said look at living organisms, what are the chances that would happen? Now we understand evolution in great detail. We understand how this works. Just saying "its so improbable God must have done it" is not only bad logic its a silly way of arguing because sooner or later someone is going to come along and show how it really happened. Science advances, god retreats. The two never co-exist it always happens the same way religion always has to give ground to science.
2016-05-24 19:12:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To simply allow the line of inquiry into the nature of the universe and life by saying "God did it" ought to be criminal. Even if your god or your god or your god created us all, don't you think he gave us a free-will and inquisitive minds for a reason? Allow the inquiry to die and you are dead inside. If you kill the thinker inside to guarantee life after death, you are already dead in this life. I am not an extreme Darwinist, nor do i claim to know the answer to this question, but a one word answer (with no evidence or logic behind it, no less) is wrong. (sorry for the split infinitive, it sound less awkward)
2007-02-09 13:52:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Two major theories exist. The elements of life began with the explosion of stars. These elements fell upon a favorable planet and evolved only to be ejected again into space to fall upon another favorable planet and evolve some more until they finally arrived upon our planet.
Another theory is that the elements started here and evolved here in one of three ways. Concentration by heat, cold or dessication.
2007-02-09 13:17:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think science has done a great job of reverse engineering what happened.
There is plenty of proof to support both Evolution and the Big Bang. And as they keep looking, they will find more.
2007-02-09 13:24:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stan W 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The ooze...mucky soupy stuff ...you know like the jar you find in the back of your friends uncleaned fridge! Put that out in the sun and watch what happens! You need some organic and some carbon and H2O and a little spark.....it's ALIVE!
2007-02-09 13:26:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by t m 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Infinite time, matter, energy = nothing won't happen eventually, but everything is exponentially more likely to develop & evolve from simple to complex rather than a giant being appearing suddenly and creating everything for kicks.
2007-02-09 13:12:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Random occurences in space and the right type of conditions on a forming planet
2007-02-09 13:26:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Krayden 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The right combination of chemical at the right circumstances. Even prior to the first living cell there were combinations of chemicales that were able to reproduce.
2007-02-09 14:37:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by max 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No one knows. Some people like to think god made everything that we have today and some people think that we were small micro organisms then fish,monkey,etc. I like to think that god made the big bang instead of at a snap of his fingers
2007-02-09 13:15:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋