it was the lone ranger and tonto
2007-02-09 13:07:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The skeletons showed proof that the man had been struck by an arrow and the woman may have been sacrificed so as not to leave the male soul alone for eternity. I read that this the first discovery of it's kind. Children had been found being protected but they had never found a couple of similar age being found together in such a "loving" manner.
2007-02-09 13:13:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by ljames1910 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes I did in fact it was on Yahoo news I didn't see arrows in fact there is no way to tell how they died. But you could see they were embracing with their heads facing eachother and their arms on eachother. How hot is that???
2007-02-09 13:12:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, I read it. Apparently these bones are thought to be 5000 years old. One theory is that the man died and, according to possible custom in those times, his wife was buried alive so that she could escort him to heaven. Something to be said for modern times after all!
2007-02-09 21:51:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I did. It was pretty creepy!!!!! Anyway, it was in a newspaper called the Daily Inter Lake. You can see it is on their website. And, you can just google it if you want to find out more!!
2007-02-09 13:08:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by rissa.rocks 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
But who fired the arrow?
His wife or her husband?
2007-02-09 15:39:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rob K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought,'How sweet'.
In a loving embrace for an eternity.
2007-02-09 13:06:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by MaryBeth 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i broody spreak grood engrish i worke hat crall centeer foor brackleys blank yoo broody wude kermit rand mi triping iss bletteer van yoors yoo honkie
2007-02-11 13:33:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by kermit_is_dead_rip 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Funny because I was in the kitchen cookng, when my husband walked in and said did you see our picture in the paper? And I said " no, why are we in the paper?!" And he showed me the pic. So yes I saw it.
2007-02-09 18:05:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by jupiter 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Modern ancient art? Or should it be Ancient modern art???
2007-02-09 13:12:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Moebious 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Robin and Marion
2007-02-09 13:09:56
·
answer #11
·
answered by . 6
·
1⤊
0⤋