In your opinion; is OJ Simpson guilty?

Question

I say he is so guilty that a travesty of justice happened when he was found not guilty. Just why was he on a 100 mile chase from the police if he was innocent? What happened to his investigation?

Answer 1

I think the jury had a combined IQ of 86. That is why he walked.
Wat be dat DNA n sheet mang da man be hoeden him down. dey be jellus o him mang.

Answer 2

I almost agree with Hawkeye, but it was his race, NOT his celebrity. Johnny Cochran won the case on "If the gloves do NOT fit, you must acquit!"
The only problem with that statement is that the gloves had been bloodsoaked and shrunk. I can't believe that the prosecution failed to point out to the jury that it had already been proven by sworn testimony that OJ had a pair of those expensive gloves AND that those bloodsoaked gloves were the absolutely largest size the manufacturer made. So, if OJ could NOT have gotten a pair larger, then whether those gloves fit or not was irrelevant.

Answer 3

In my opinion yes he was guilty because in the civil procedures he was found guilty. However so much evidence was thrown out in the criminal procedure they had to find him innocent. Good thing about the court system is even though you can not be charged twice for the same crime you can be sued in civil court for the same charges.

Answer 4

I believe he is guilty. The prosecution did a terrible job with that case. It must be so hard for the Brown and Goldman families to see him free. Thank goodness they won a civil case against him are being pro active about blocking him from receiving any money for any project related to those murders.

Answer 5

Miss 61348 said "get over it, it's 2007!"
OK, missy! Why don't you get over Jim Crow and all that other BS which your race keeps so close to your wantom bosom. Take your own advice!
OJ is guilty of being a feral beast with a low IQ and swift arms and legs. He is a LOSER forever! And he KNOWS it!
He's just another worthless street niggger.

Answer 6

The evidence against Scott Peterson would require a paragraph and resulted in a conviction, Simpson's could fill a book and he walked.
Black jubilation on his acquittal made me aware of racial differences.
Thanks OJ, and I hope in your quest for 'the real killer', someday, somewhere, on some golf coarse, you find him.

Answer 7

Guilty as sin, The jury was full of moon rocks. I can't believe that sone idiots cheered when he got off. He even wrote a book "So What If I Did it."

Answer 8

I think he's 100%guilty--I can't imagine the pain Ron & Nicole's families must be going thru day after day knowing he is enjoying life without penalty. It sickens me.

Answer 9

For those whom are not familiar w\reverse speech, it is a form of meta-communication. In fact, we learn to speak backwards before we do forwards. In most cases, when we are lying, the truth tends to make itself known in reverse. Here are reversals on OJ:
http://www.reversespeech.com/ojsimpson.htm

Answer 10

interior america, the judicial device supplies purely 2 alternatives, "to blame" & "no longer to blame". it would be a travesty to discover a individual to blame if there have been any probability they did no longer commit the crime in question. In Scotland, a individual could be found "to blame", "no longer to blame" or "no longer shown". Had O.J. been tried in Scotland, I have not got any doubt the call could have been "no longer shown", meaning, in effect, of direction he did it yet he had some good attorneys. i'm surprised he has no longer been abducted and (slowly) tortured to death via now. Nicole & Ronald's families are far extra effective human beings than i think of i could desire to be of their subject!