Check out snopes.com. It's right-wing Vannity/Limpballs-esque lunacy.
2007-02-09 10:49:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cerulean 3
·
7⤊
2⤋
Of course, none of it has been proven, but the list is rather alarming. What you have seen posted has been largely reported already, (it's old news) and they all did die and were connected to the Clintons as you keep seeing it posted. As far as any other evidence, all you have is the circumstances you have seen. It is not false information, and one does need to wonder how such bad luck has been connected to "friends" of the Clintons. But again, you have no other evidence to go by.
Oh, and Ed-Mike, you give Bush so much credit for being the biggest baffoon ever to be in the White House. Which is it - He's stupid, or he is an evil mastermind?
2007-02-09 10:58:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Whootziedude 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bill couldn't keep a stain off a dress... but he's going to cover up multiple murders so well that no one has ANYTHING on him about any of them?
the more murders, the more lose threads, the higher likelihood that you'll get caught...
this, to me, sounds like those same "Bush did 9-11" conspiracy theories...
frankly, I don't think either man is competent enough to cover up anything that large... with all the media on both sides looking into everything... someone would have found something concrete by now...
that's just my opinion...
2007-02-09 11:31:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
There are 35 suspicious deaths concerning the Clintons. All circumstancial (sic), but does raise an eyebrow. The Clintons are horrid evil people and I wouldn't rule any of them out, BUT nothing has been proven legally speaking.(of course, they WERE running the country after all, so how tough would it be to slip justice? Don't forget Randy Weaver, Waco, or Elian Gonzalez. The Clinton's hands are penty dirty.)
Of course, the media being leftist, we don't hear very much about the wrongdoings of Hillbilly Clinton or his shrill, bloated Marxist wife.
Google it, because I'm about to log out and ain't got the time for link-hunting.
2007-02-09 11:43:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yahoo or google (Arkancide) if you haven't already.
Very strange stuff. Don't forget Juanita Broadericks story that Bull Clinton RAPED her.
I read her story and am convinced that it sure sounded like she was telling the TRUTH. He was MEAN to her, vicious! Just the way I imagine a women-hating politican like Clinton would be like!
I for one, cannot imagine this man OR HIS WIFE running for the ultimate political prize, the PRESIDENCY of the USA. You have to ask yourself, WHY???
G*d forbid this lady should become our leader or put this VERY MAN back in office!
2007-02-09 10:58:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Of course. Bill Clinton was president as a cover. He really is a hit man for the mob.
Now he can just pardon himself.
2007-02-09 11:00:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by arvis3 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
after studying on it for about a year. I realized that clinton was so good at covering up his tracks. the allegations will never be revealed. a lot of people disapeared under his terms both as governor and his presidency but as a lawyer. he slipped through the nets. and nobody can prove anything.. he WAS the best lawyer in his area in arkansas.he can brag about all the criminalw he got off the hook in his early years.his financial records show a huge income during the years that these people disapeared too. he had a motive, and the money to do whatever he wanted to do... you have to decide if he did it or bnot.. the courts have put all those cases in a file marked. dismissed.. old history
2007-02-09 10:51:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by road runner 4
·
5⤊
5⤋
Not directly by his own hand. He's too cowardly to do it himself. He had it done like a Mafia Don would, or a communist dictator is more akin to clinton!
2007-02-09 11:08:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is simply another attempt to deflect attention away from the real issues that plague our nation. None of those issues, however, deal with President Clinton (or Senator Clinton) when it comes to so-called mysterious death phenomena.
2007-02-09 11:20:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jackson Leslie 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Many people did mysteriously die around Bill Clinton. It is true. I watched a powerful series of interviews that included the son of a Sheriff who was run off the road (died) and his house ransacked. He had been investigating the death of Vince Foster. All the files were taken.
I saw video of the Attorney General of Arkansas livid with fury that Clinton had ever been elected President. Clinton had gotten the nickname "Slick Willie" for his aiding drug smugglers as governor of Arkansas - and getting away with it.
On C-SPAN, I watched interviews with several computer techs who, upon discovering the Clintons had not handed over the contents of an entire email server related to the Communist Chinese campaign funding - were threatened by Clinton's goons.
One Senator in those hearings stated that "Over 100 persons have either fled the country or plead the fifth to avoid having to testify against the Clintons." That is serious stuff.
The Ken Starr investigation into Clinton's activities began with the Rose Law Firm where Bill and Hillary were signors who sent millions of tax dollars to a buddy who built hidden compartments in aircraft for smuggling. The buddy did not upgrade his business in any visible manner, so there was a question as to how the money was used.
Clinton himself was a cocaine addict apparently through his Presidency. His first act was to remove mandatory drug testing for White House staff. His own brother, in a sting operation, told cops that Bill had "a nose like a hoover" as he was making a purchase.
If Conservatives had better influence in the mainstream media, you would hear more about these issues. But, who is even reminded today of Clinton's 1998 Iraq Liberation Act? Only FOX reminds the public that Democrats made the decision to take out Saddam by force...
2007-02-09 10:47:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by speakeasy 6
·
8⤊
7⤋