Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't she keep her name when she married Bill.
Did she change it to Hillary Rodham Clinton when he ran for governor or was it when he ran for president.
Oh ya, when did she drop the Rodham?
I'm not against women keeping their name when they get married, but I don't care for people that give up on their principals to get what they want.
2007-02-09 10:38:05 · 16 answers · asked by Walter D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She is a politician, what do you expect?
2007-02-09 10:45:27 · answer #1 · answered by AT 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What happen to Q&A and dialogue? The bulk of this stuff in USA Politics & Gov just seems to be about venting. What does it accomplish? No one seems any happier for it ... the postings never improve. No one is informing anyone. If anyone even had a valid point sandwiched in the criticism, it would get lost. What a disappointment.
I see Y!A is limiting thumbs up and thumbs down ... removing some of them after placement. I noticed because I check back to see additional answers on some questions today, hoping for some real input and that's when I saw the thumbs up and downs had been removed. It was kind of pleasant actually. It was like seeing a wall freshly painted after gangland graffetti has been removed.
Thumbs UP to Y!A !
2007-02-17 18:11:10 · answer #2 · answered by ... 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you hear is what the media reports. She is still Hillary Rodham Clinton and has been since I've known about her as 1st Lady of Arkansas and through the 1st Lady of the US.
2007-02-09 18:43:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Her only goal is to get back into the White House, so she will be the 1 st woman president and the 1 st wife of a previous president and will do whatever it takes.
Look at how quickly she blamed others about the way she voted for the war in Iraq
She is a hypocrite
2007-02-09 18:49:34 · answer #4 · answered by Murray H 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, she is a power hungry maniac. She is a liar like most politicians. The whole thing was politically motivated.
I watched a meeting she had with Code Pink in 2003, where she lays out the whole reason why we needed to take Saddam out. Now, she wants to be elected President and has a problem, she voted for the war.
2007-02-09 18:46:07 · answer #5 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The last liberal democrat from the north to be elected president was JFK. The democrats love their northern liberals but they are unelecteable. Since 1963, the only democrats elected president have been southern...........
None since.
As a republican I hope they nominate her, it will be a sure win for us.
2007-02-17 15:07:48 · answer #6 · answered by gbpipe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question could be asked of ANY politician. Hillary just seems to intimidate some and they show it by attempting to tear her down.
2007-02-09 19:41:14 · answer #7 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, she's a politician-- that says it all. She will do whatever is necessary to get elected. I'm sure she does stand for some things she believes but bottom line is getting elected.
2007-02-09 18:42:29 · answer #8 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
She probably has her own agenda...after all, the important thing is to leave a legacy...she will do what she has to in order to leave her mark...but she will try to unite the country and do what the people want her to do no matter how it's done.
2007-02-17 13:18:29 · answer #9 · answered by basport_2000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is possible that you could be wrong and she did not give up on her principals to get what she wanted. The name change may have been for Chelsea.
2007-02-09 18:57:15 · answer #10 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you obsess about male politicians the way you do female ones? If not, maybe you ought to spend a little more time focusing on your flaws, rather than on other's flaws.
2007-02-09 18:53:12 · answer #11 · answered by Cerulean 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋