I'm an Aussie, but in the interests of the game, I hope England win the one day Cricket series. Even though I'm Australian, it's boring if the one team wins all the time. But I think this Australian side's the best. I didn't think England would win in the first few overs, but they fought back really well. And I also thought Matt Hayden was L.B.W. when he wasn't given out.
2007-02-09 10:18:28 · 16 answers · asked by samootch 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
No i'm not suprised Aussies lost the cricket last night .....once again the selectors got it wrong by dropping Stuart Clarke. The selectors lost that match last night i always thought u played ur best players in the finals. Aussies losing 6 wickets for 33 runs in the last 10 overs which they didnt complete wot are the selectors trying to do........BRING BACK STUART CLARKE. Watson could hae proving his fitness for the world cup in the Chappell Hadlee trophy in New Zealand which starts on the 16th of Feb.
2007-02-09 13:15:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
im not really surprised,England have been playing some good cricket the last three matches and Australia have been a bit stale also the Aussies have been playing with different players in preparation for the world cup so the side isn't that settled at the moment,i still hope Australia win the series though but its good to see a contest,
p.s brad hodge was clearly not out when he was given l.b.w, it all even its self out.
2007-02-09 11:31:35 · answer #2 · answered by FORKY 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure, i'm basking interior the warmth afterglow of an England win on effects. even with taking part in against the host u . s ., and throwing away the lead, they did no longer bottle it. besides the indisputable fact that, somewhat fact verify right here: it became in basic terms Sweden. They constantly change off while they qualify from the gang. seem on the senior group in 1992, 2002, 2004 and 2006 while they have been coached via the present decrease than-21 supervisor. while they qualified from the gang, they lost interior the 1st knock-out around, and this would be a topic among Scandinavian countries. Germany or Italy would be a extra durable prospect interior the final.
2016-09-28 21:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all, if you compare the 2 sides England have hardly changed there line up. There boys are building there form at the right time.
Then look at Australia, they drop Stuart Clarke!
Leave out Mitchell Johnson who was leading the wickets takings.
They brought in Shane Watson to bat in the lower order which isn't ideal for some one trying to build form. Especially when you are asked to belt some balls in the dying overs.
Hogg came in with only one match under his belt.
I could keep on going, but in the end it shows that the tri-series is a complete joke and totally out dated when the Aussie selectors make big changes in a final.
2007-02-09 15:39:48 · answer #4 · answered by james h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Aussies were too bad in the field,by their standards,otherwise beating England was very much possible.
2007-02-09 17:04:56 · answer #5 · answered by Aq 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a tremendous come back by England. They have made a good turn around. Full credit to Paul Collingwood.
2007-02-09 18:07:08 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England put up a strong fight and they won and one day cricket is nobody's game till it ends
2007-02-09 18:13:57 · answer #7 · answered by akband 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because whoever plays well on the particular day wins the match.past is past .record doesnt matter.
2007-02-09 15:46:25 · answer #8 · answered by ramesh s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i was not surprised.the english men have the potential to win over the aussies.but yesterday they did it.i was very happy for them.
2007-02-09 16:02:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. i am not surprised they won the match becuase they played well and were supposed to win the match
2007-02-09 14:49:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋