Hard to say. Hitler was responsible for way more deaths, but Idi probably would've been responsible for more than Hitler if he could have (I mean considering how he butchered so many of his own people, what would he have done if he had the power to attack foreigners)? Guess I'll say Hitler because he actually caused more deaths, even though I think Idi was probably even more evil at heart.
2007-02-09 10:18:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
We gotta choose now??? Lessee, Hitler gassed people and tried to run all over Europe (and did a pretty decent job of it) while Idi Amin just ate the people he considered enemies. And still left the river full of dead bodies.
I'm going to have to say Hitler was the 'worst', but that's only because I'm a Scandinavian/German mix and there is still a bit of cultural guilt all these years later. I think it's about time we got over that, by the way...
~Morg~
2007-02-09 17:46:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by morgorond 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say Amin only because he was more Self Edificating
and self indulgent in his dealings
Hitler was very Nationalistic. and he seemed to have the
advancement of Germany at heart..From what I have read
Amin was much more evil and heartless to his own
people..
2007-02-09 19:33:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Robert B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What do you mean by "worst" ? If you mean the most inhumane, then Hitler. If you mean the most incompetent, then Amin.
2007-02-09 17:38:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Count Acumen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
(Hitler
2007-02-09 17:41:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋