I agree with your first answer.......the troops should be on our borders. Also, I think the politicians should start earning the money and do the job they were elected for.....to represent us. They were not elected to find dirt on the other party. If they put the same amount of effort into solving our countries problems, as they are dogging people out in another party...things would be so much more better in the US.
2007-02-09 10:15:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by cajunrescuemedic 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
money isn't a attention whilst making plans national protection. You wouldnt save any money besides via fact a lot of those countries wouldve drawed aggressors and we would desire to be engaged in greater wars. greater wars, greater spending, greater bloodshed. i admire Reagans kind. greater effective the place we outspend anyone on protection rigidity and not in any respect would desire to combat a conflict on our own soil, and in many cases on no account would desire to combat wars till its somebody fairly loopy like Saddam Hussein and in such situations the conflict is comparatively basic. protecting the country is the troops #a million precedence. Do you unquestionably S Korea might exist right this moment if we didnt have troops over there? the answer to communist aggression isnt to offer up. And via electing a communist like we did in 08 is a extensive step backwards. We deliver billions in help money additionally to the countries. would desire to we supply up sending help to save money? Obama desires to double down on that, throughout the time of a recession no much less!! If youre hectic approximately deficits and our national debt vote republican. they're the only ones with the schedule of a balanced budget and paying off debt. The democrats right this moment at the instant are not those of the previous. they are turning out to be the party of Karl Marx and Joseph Stalin. The democrat party decrease than this new some distance left mentality has grow to be the party of extensive government, crooked spending charges they arent even analyzing or giving the prevalent public time to view chock packed with politcal payoff all occurring our debt.
2016-12-17 06:17:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well...if heaven forbid the United States had to go into a war with another country....don't you think it would be helpful to have our allies there beside us? HELPING us protect our country?
It's about "ill scratch your back...if you scratch mine."
2007-02-09 09:34:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes I agree they should be here on our borders, coasts, air space, etc. They should also get triple pay, benefits and stationary housing so they can have a life/family.
2007-02-09 09:32:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I certainly would love to see my government take care of it's citizens first, protect OUR borders, etc.
2007-02-09 09:38:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by kathy059 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Just like we were doing on 911, right?
ps: I thing we do a better job of protecting our own when we kill them BEFORE they get here!
2007-02-09 09:33:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
yes
2007-02-09 09:37:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No but I am tired of dumba$$ democrats and liberals whining about it all the time when they are too scared to do anything about it!
2007-02-09 09:34:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
5⤋