Her campaign slogan- HILLARY-OUS!!! ha ha!!!
2007-02-09 09:27:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by El Tigre 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
well for 1 you can't keep the Bush family in the White house because he's already served 2 terms and that's all they're allowed. For 2 someone said something about hillary needing military experience...uhm something that Bush is lacking in as well so that's a joke.
But I for one feel that the voters are tired and want change and this year the Democrats are going to win the election with Hillary as the runner? Not sure yet... But Democrats have already taken over both houses, but then again I could be wrong...
2007-02-09 17:32:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd like the Bush family to retire from politics. Could they be any more stupid or corrupt? But I don't know about Hillary. I don't think Bill should ever be allowed near the Whitehouse again after his escapade with Monica. Plus Hillary was New York State Senator and did absolutely nothing for Western New York, where I live and there is a million people(including people in the suburbs). She could have improved our region but instead she focused on NYC. She's done nothing for my city, region so don't expect her to do anything for our country.
2007-02-09 17:30:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by markbigmanabell 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Keep the Bush family in the White House is wrong on so many levels. I kind of like Hillary Clinton.
2007-02-09 19:56:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Looks like the Repugs are hell of scared of her being the Democrat choice. Even the Repug criminal, Tom DeLay, warned his peers that she'd be hard to beat. Now the Repug NeoCons, including Madam Candy Crowley and Madam Babe Buchanan, Old Man Blizer. etc. etc. are appearing all over cable news to tear her down abd promote Obama. I thought that's pretty hilarious. Oh yes, the Repug media honkers haven't stopped opening up debates on their shows to get their guests talking about who'd be the cjoice - Hillary or Obama. Just watch their Repug guests crucifying Hillary and thumbing for Obama! What a joke!
By the way, Africa looks like the next nation most Americans with wealth are eyeing. And Obama seems to be a favorite for the White House for these voters. Maybe, these wealthy people should be made to remember: Help out the poor and destitute in America first before they start flooding their American-earned dollars and throw them abroad!
2007-02-09 19:18:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by United_Peace 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, you don't have much respect for the constitution anyway so why not hold a coronation. If the majority of American voters don't want her then she won't win. But Bush couldn't get elected dog catcher anymore. And seriously, most of the hawks in the White house were like Cheney, who has famously said "I had other priorities" during Viet Nam and got deferred several times.
2007-02-09 17:28:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by justa 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think she'd be much better than the W. And no, she hasn't had military service, but you can hardly call W's stint in the Air Force reserve service. Besides, which Bush are we going to put in there now? Jeb? Or better yet, his Uncle who just got caught scamming government contracts? I KNOW, put Jenna in the White House!!!!
2007-02-09 17:29:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by chelebeee 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well, we know that even liberal billionaire George Soros doesn't want Hillary in the White House. He's backing Obama.
2007-02-09 17:32:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by senior citizen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As much as I don't like the Bush's , I'd rather them than Hillary. She's not qualified!!!!! She should at least have done some military service if she expects to be commander in chief, something Clintons seem to avoid.
2007-02-09 17:22:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kiss My Shaz 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
If the world wasn't ready for a first woman Vice President (remember Mondale & Ferraro), then the world won't be ready for a woman President either.
2007-02-09 18:58:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary is a scourge on America and our freedom of speech . It's not bad enough she wants our money for her communist projects , she wants to control Internet access and what we know & when we know it .
2007-02-10 01:30:17
·
answer #11
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋