English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ever?

2007-02-09 08:55:00 · 16 answers · asked by aphotic nostrum 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

16 answers

As soon as people learn how to live peacefully the world will know peace.

People bicker because they each want the same thing, namely power. When people realize the power of love is greater than the love of power, the world will know peace.

2007-02-09 09:09:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

almost impossible, we humans are not perfect, we have lots of good qualities such as happiness, hope, and love, but we also have equal or possibly more bad qualities, such as sadness, hopelessness, hatred, and jealousy. Also no one is equal, life is not fair, everyone has their own opinion of things, therefore we are not equal and the people with more money are stronger, making it not fair for all of us. The only way that i can think up of to make the human race achieve peace, is to destroy the human race so they wont create and more war, disruption, etc.

2007-02-09 11:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by forwardtodarkness 2 · 0 0

Have you ever seen any peace in any parts of the world? I don't think we ever will. Because we're humans. We just can't tolerate each other. Admit it, there are times you can't stand a particular person either. There are indeed those who are really noble like Mother Theresa and Gandhi. However, there are far more bad apples in the world. Sad but true. *Sigh*

2007-02-10 02:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Phoenix 2 · 0 0

Sadly, no. Humans by nature are territorial, and also feel emotions like anger, sadness, etc. So unless someone makes a mind control device, I doubt there would ever be world peace.

2007-02-09 08:59:25 · answer #4 · answered by ???? 2 · 0 0

What kind of peace do you mean?

Actually, in our daily life, we oftentimes experience some conflicts, even with our own parents or our best friends! But some of those conflicts end peacefully, some never end. It is the part or our life. In fact, conflict that ends peacefully can strengthen our relationship.

The same thing happens also in greater scope, e.g. international relationship. The most important thing is whether we can forgive.

2007-02-09 22:13:04 · answer #5 · answered by r083r70v1ch 4 · 0 0

Economically, that is the ruin of all systems, and therefore, the powers that be, create conflict to profit by them. The world as we know it now, can not function, if there were world peace. Completely depressing.

2007-02-09 18:57:19 · answer #6 · answered by lisa l 3 · 0 0

In a given inhabitants, some contributors will continuously lie outside the norm (say 3 sigma). those contributors will both rigidity the limitations defining the inhabitants, both causing it to dissolve or to reason maximum individuals of the inhabitants to suppress the the minority to guard the defining limitations. In both case, conflict is inevitable. If we were to eliminate all those who did not in superb condition into some arbitrary type, then the bell curve ought to 'tighten' and contours that were previous proper ought to grow to be insupportable. get jointly: If Hitler and the Nazi's were to have succeeded, then possibly blond hair that grew to grow to be upfront gray ought to grow to be insupportable. in the different route, if all of us grew to grow to be dramatically better tolerant, the bell curve ought to widen and previous features condemned via maximum individuals ought to commence to call for social popularity. get jointly: immediately, we may be able to confirm an boost in gay rights activism. ought to that be happening if the talk over premarital sex wasn't fading into consent?

2016-12-03 23:18:35 · answer #7 · answered by rieck 4 · 0 0

Temporary, short-term peace, yes. Long-term peace. No. You just have to enjoy life when it is peaceful, and you just have to be careful when things get ugly.

2007-02-09 09:07:21 · answer #8 · answered by mac 7 · 0 0

It would be fairly easy if everyone understood the difficulty of it, and decided to evolve personally, rather than strive for the evolution of the mankind (that's where all political theories and systems went wrong).

2007-02-09 09:16:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe but It would require drastic change:
No RELIGION
enough supplies to help everyones needs not just a select few

2007-02-09 09:47:02 · answer #10 · answered by Vash 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers