2007-02-09 08:31:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Possibly hundreds because the baby stands to inherit about $400 million if the courts so decide and the dad will have control of that. Guess what, they'll all come crawling out of the woodwork for that kind of money.
2007-02-09 09:08:57 · answer #1 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree. He likely felt he have been given away with killing her son so he killed Anna to. It replaced into obtrusive she by no potential regarded at him as a lover. His obsession and greed with Anna have been given interior the way. what proportion 20 years previous die very uncommon. what proportion 40 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous die in a over dose? She regarded healthy and correctly. too lots of a twist of fate. although the newborn isn't his i'm specific it rather is Larry's that they had a protracted term relationship till Howard ok Stern have been given interior the way. That guy is diabolical .
2016-11-03 00:20:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many. Men without scruples. Just interested in money. The truth is that the child has only one father. And that nobody with humanitarian scruples and feelings would intent to enable a father-son relation.
2007-02-09 08:46:34 · answer #3 · answered by robertonereo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wonder if Vegas bookies are going to set the under/over line on the number of putative fathers that will come forward? (Imagine what kind of crap would be happening if we DIDN'T have DNA testing available! This is one case where, if they were lined up on the stage of MAURY, for one of those paternity test results shows, each and every guy up there would WANT to hear Maury Povich say, "******... You ARE the father!")
2007-02-09 08:43:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm the daddy!!! Now give me my money. lol just playing i think that Anna was poisoned by her now widowed/ lawyer husband just so he can get all her money. OH do i smell mini series on ABC watch out I'm setting claim on the story line so if anyone want in on it hit me back.
2007-02-09 08:53:23 · answer #5 · answered by mrfeem 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
67 men claim that but there is exactly no genetic trcing unless asking a relative.
2007-02-09 08:35:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
6 to 8
thousand
2007-02-09 08:39:29 · answer #7 · answered by walkerfountain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With DNA, what good will it do them to look stupid? But 2 as we all know have come forth.
2007-02-09 08:49:24 · answer #8 · answered by beachprincesssc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sure all that had a sexual encounter with her! Probably more as well being that she is not here to say that she didn't sleep with that guy.
2007-02-09 08:39:41 · answer #9 · answered by MANDY 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am waiting for Clinton to raise his hand?
Honestly is there a number that high???
2007-02-09 08:44:36 · answer #10 · answered by r h 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋