Do they really want to be saved or do they wish to continue in their self- tribal destruction? If we went in and destroyed their cities and tribal leadership would they not survive successfully just like Germany, Japan, and a South Korea did?
2007-02-09 08:14:07 · 2 answers · asked by zeepogee 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
No we should just leave.
They are already unhappy that they have made very little progress or contribution over the last several centuries while everything the "infidels" touch turns to gold. Everything modern they have comes from us, they haven't really accomplished much of anything. It's an insult to their god for the infidels to have this influence. Our invasion made it worse.
Worse, it's a grievous insult to their god that the infidels have invaded them and are trying to force an "infidel" government on them. Our presence is an affront to their religion and there is nothing we can do to change that.
I say we just leave and let them kill each other over their own different interpretation of a fantasy book. If we cut off all support (getting our oil instead from russia - which has more than the entire middle east) the middle east will just collapse completely and maybe they will find some measure of tolerance from it.
2007-02-09 08:23:14 · answer #1 · answered by Mike K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they don't want to be saved. They want their own government and it will be a struggle for that to happen but in the meantime a lot of men are dieing in the cross fire. It was said, that to pull out of viet nam would mean communism would spred all over the world and we might as well learn to speak Chinese.
What did happen is the settled their own battles and are now having private businesses become more Democracy.
Germany, Japan and South Korea did just fine also.
But unlike all those places they want their oil which they would rather stay and destroy all the people before leaving.
He who has the oil rules the world.
2007-02-09 16:20:35 · answer #2 · answered by Steven 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋