Do your research now...
Not saying Rex will ever be as good as Manning BUT...
Compare their 1st 16 game season passer ratings
Manning: 71.2
Grossman: 73.9
Is Rex getting a bad deal when he's essentially a rookie?
2007-02-09 05:07:31 · 7 answers · asked by AgentZero 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Grossman is good, he is just up and down. He will settle down next year like all first year QB's. He will be fine, and probably good. He went to the super bowl his first full year. And the D sucked and was up and down in a lot of games just like him. He's good.
2007-02-09 05:19:03 · answer #1 · answered by dave k 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Rex's season really wasnt that bad. The problem is he is either really good, or really bad. If I were Rex I would want out of Chicago because everybody there hates him, and I think he would do much better in a place like Houston, or Minnesota, where he would actually have some good receivers to throw to.
2007-02-09 07:17:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Grossmans been in the league 4 years now and has had that much time to study the playbook, injured or healthy. He still can't get it done and the Bears win in spite of him. They were fortunate that this was a down year in the NFC.
Manning started right out of college and took him only one year to adjust and become a Pro Bowl QB.
2007-02-09 05:21:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone has been pretty hard on Rex due to his turnovers. As a Bear fan, I've had to defend him on many occasions. I think he will develop more poise and grow as a quarterback. He hasn't had enough starts to give up on yet. Hopefully someday, he'll start to step up in the pocket and be able to take a hit while still executing passes.
2007-02-09 06:46:16 · answer #4 · answered by JenJen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AFC East - maximum of your possibilities in this convention are authentic looking except for the Jets. they don't look to be a 12-4 team. AFC North- Pittsburgh and Cleveland have difficult schedules. 9-7 or 10-6 is lifelike for them. Cincy is better of a 7-9 team to me. Baltimore is a 5 or 6 win team. AFC South- i imagine Tennessee is better effective than a 4 win team. yet, except that, i love your possibilities for this branch. AFC West- i don't love those possibilities in any respect. Denver isn't a 14 win team. The Chiefs gained't end purely before the Chargers. i will say SD wins about 11, KC about 7, and Denver with 8 or 9 wins. Oakland is a 5 or 6 win team to me. NFC East- those possibilities look authentic seeking to me. NFC North- i imagine the Lions and Bears with do extremely better effective than you're expecting. yet, neither of them are .500 communities. the different possibilities are superb. NFC South- that is a difficult branch to foretell. Your wager is as solid as mine for that one. NFC West- I ordinarily agree which includes your possibilities there. I do imagine Seattle is a 8 win team regardless of the reality that. it really is my in hardship-free words conflict of words.
2016-12-03 23:04:24 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's that bad. They got to the Super Bowl in spite of him, not because of him. And he choked, and they lost. Reference what Ben Roethlisberger did in his first real 16-game season. He has a ring.
2007-02-09 07:53:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with you. not completely though because i like peyton manning, but grossman has gotten a lot of bad hype. probably because he's been inconsistent the past few games.
2007-02-09 05:16:15 · answer #7 · answered by kace 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋