Anna Nicole Smith has problems with her stepson and then suddenly he dies in his late 50s. Then she gives birth to (supposedly) Howard K. Stern’s baby and her other child dies suddenly at 20. Then she is going through a paternity suit to prove that Howard is not the baby daddy and suddenly she dies at 39. Everyone who inconveniences him dies of “drug overdoses”. Now, there is coincidence and there is give me a break! Anyone else here think the police should be REALLY investigating Howard K. Stern to the max?
2007-02-09 04:45:20 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
No, that's a ridiculous scenario. What's his motive? He already has TONS of money, so that's not it........
2007-02-09 04:50:06 · answer #1 · answered by wjigga22 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yeah, my husband thinks the same thing.
However...ANS's son didn't die from a drug overdose, nor did her stepson, E. Pierce Marshall. Anna's son died from a drug interaction (which was all prescribed legally), and the stepson died from an infection.
Additionally, since ANS & HKS were not legally married (the thing in the Bahamas was not legally binding), he doesn't inherit ANYTHING at this point, unless she wrote him into her will. I'd be surprised if that were the case, considering that (a) she was only 39 and probably wasn't expecting to need a will any time soon, and (b) she had recently declared bankruptcy and didn't actually have anything to will to anyone.
On top of that, there are two legal situations that need to be cleared up, before HKS would get anything...One is the lawsuit over the ex's money - he may be dead, but his heirs are fighting tooth and nail to get their hands on the cash. The other is the paternity suit - we may find out that HKS isn't actually related to the baby at all, which means he wouldnt' even be able to get his hands on the trust fund.
Honestly, I think he was better off with her alive...at least then he had access to whatever money she had. Now he's pretty much hosed.
2007-02-09 05:00:23 · answer #2 · answered by abfabmom1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I too also think Howard K Stern is involved, lets put it this way, Anna's Step son dies, so he doesn't get the money now, then Daniel Dies, he doesn't get the money either, then there is the baby, howard has his name on the birth certificate, probably not thinking that someone is going to challenge him on the paternity on the baby, so that would mean if Anna dies he gets the money for being the baby's father, well then there is the fact that they get married right after her son dies. Well I think Howard thought if Anna would be dead all these problems would go away he and the baby would get all that money and be set. I definately think Howard K Stern is involved somehow. I also think that this mystery will never be solved ever.
2007-02-10 14:26:05 · answer #3 · answered by bugalove 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well...nobody...and I mean nobody likes that guy. Sounds like a truly sinister character. I just finished reading all the articles I could find on him and I don't like him either. I read where he searched Daniel's pockets right after he was found dead, took out some Meth pills and flushed them down the john...then denied any such thing. Could he have been the supplier? Why eliminate the evidence...they'd find it on autopsy anyway? Also it was he that secured the place in the Bahamas (and didn't pay the bill for the guy that found it) as a means to escape Birkhead's claim that she was on Meth while preggers and he was concerned about the health of the fetus. Birkhead's been out there all along and I believe Stern has been driving this bus of destruction as everyone else suspects. The truth will come out eventually. Her sister has a scathing book coming out...can't wait! Why was their a "commitment ceremony" done on a boat before they even buried Daniel? It wasn't even legal. Her other long time lawyer performed the ceremony and he quit working for her a week before she died. What scared him off? There are no surprises where money is concerned. Stern has dirty hands as I see it. Can't read it any other way as his behavior has been so blatantly territorial...like the vulture sitting on the tree branch just waiting for his prey. Stay tuned, huh?
2007-02-10 02:58:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree completely with your theory. A witness reportedly saw Stern remove drugs from Daniel's pocket and flush them. That indicates involvement and guilt in Daniel's death. He was with both people when they died. In other words he had the means to commit these crimes. Following the money trail,as you did certainly gives Stern the motive. He had both the means and the motive for both murders. I wonder what finally caused him to hasten Anna Nicole's demise before they were legally married. There could only be one reason. Anna Nicole was certainly familiar with the concept of marrying someone rich in order to inherit their fortune; she did the same thing herself! While Howard K. Stern was pushing for a legal wedding Anna Nicole was becoming more suspicious of his true motive and involvement in Daniel's death. She arranged the commitment ceremony to satisfy Stern while keeping him from any legal claim to her money. Stern, unsatisfied, continued to push for a legal ceremony. Anna resisted and then finally frustrated by his pestering gave him a firm answer about marriage...No! Stern knew the relationship was ending. He was also concerned that Anna Nicole would testify against him at next month's inquest into Daniel's death. However risky he exercised his last option. Many will wonder how Stern could be so deluded to think he would ever get away with both killings only a couple of months apart. They will think... It's too obvious, no one would think they would get away with it. Well a true psychopath would. Remember Scott Peterson. Who would possibly believe his story! What are the chances that someone would go fishing on Christmas Eve and his wife would disappear on the same day. Remember ninety per-cent of the time the killer is the husband or boyfriend. Just like Scott Peterson did, Howard K. Stern think's he can get away with it.. Get ready for the next gavel to gavel coverage of the trial of the century.
2016-05-24 01:37:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree, I think it is very possible that Howard K. Stern murdered, the Ex-stepson, then Anna's son, and Anna as well, my concern is, if he does somehow get the inheritance Anna was after, will he do something to the baby too
2007-02-11 16:08:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES..TOTALLY AGREE..they won't move to howard k stern until after the results of her exam today.
I think...H.K. Stern wanted his hands on the 400 million dollars she was Suppose to get from the lawsuit BUT the courts never awarded her the money. He has been sayingt hey are to be married but hasn't done it. I think he kept the son and Anna on drugs to manipulate them..I think Howard planned on making sure she OD after she was awarded the 400 million but his plans backfired and she died before hand because of all the meds in her system. and he took out the son first to make sure he couldn't inherit the 400 million and then he has a reason why Anna Nicole would "try" to kill herself because she was depressed over her son's death.
I think Howard K. Stern is Extremely Guilty and He gets what he deserves.
2007-02-09 04:51:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sources tell ET Anna Nicole did have a will. It was created before Daniel's death and named him as her sole heir. Howard was named as the executor of her estate. Soon after that Daniel dies in the bahamas where the U.S cannot touch him, then he brings her to an Indian reservation in Florida where the U.S goverment cannot get involved and she dies, coincidence or MURDER
2007-02-11 15:32:38 · answer #8 · answered by nelson s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I agree with you. I would be investigating him. He was there in the hospital room when her son Daniel died. How convenient that Anna Nicole was asleep when he died. And now she's dead and he was also in the room. the only other people that were in that hotel room (in and out) were the private nurse and body gaurd, who I would investigate also!
2007-02-09 04:51:36 · answer #9 · answered by pamomof4 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think he is guilty of anna and daniels death, but not the step son...
Or she could have od'd on Trim Spa pills...
Is it me or does Howard K. Stern always have the most bloodshot eyes?
2007-02-09 05:03:20 · answer #10 · answered by teepers 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
MY CYNICAL SIDE THINKS THE SAME THING MORE OR LESS.
PERFECY SCENARIO FOR GREEDY LAWYER TO CLEAN UP
ON THAT LINGERING 1/2 BILLION!
DRUG INFESTED FAMILY+MILLIONS OF DOLLARS+LAWYER BOYFRIEND/HUSBAND+ANNA NICOLE SMITH= RED FLAGS...
SOUNDS LIKE A CASE FOR MATTLOCK!
2007-02-09 04:54:49 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋