Are the liberals really joining forces with the radical muslims??

Question

Wow! Now it all makes perfect sense!

Answer 1

It seems to be the case, esp. when everyone ignores the fact that Dan Rather, a champion of liberal bias, was fired for lying about Pres. Bush. Also, the liberals have no definite plan to attack terrorism after 9/11 and to destroy it. They consider the 3,000 or so deaths on 9/11 as just numbers. This number was more than were killed at Pearl Harbor! This is war! We should cut off trade with Red China, the world's biggest supporter of terrorism in money and weapons. A large part if not all of North Korea's nuclear arsenal is supplied by Red China. Moreover, a huge amount of weapons have been sent from North Korea to terrorists. In fact, when we were in force in Afghanistan to topple the Taliban there, a large cave there contained an immense amount of Red Chinese weapons. What's more a Red Chinese colonel said recently, "We will destroy you" (referring to the U. S. ). I don't think the liberals can add 2 + 2. This is a no brainer. Chamberlain, just before WWII tried to appease Hitler (a terrorist himself, who terrorized countries & actually gobbled them up) by giving him Czechoslovakia. But Hitler then took Poland & later attacked England or the U. K. The liberals are trying to talk terrorists out of terrorizing & are trying to give them land (as in Israel) to appease them. That's idiotic nonsense. When will people learn from history. You can't appease an enemy of our country that has already supported the killing of 3,000 Americans. Ronald Reagan was right, there is only "Peace through Strength." Ask any kid on the school yard, a bully will not back down if you're weak or have no one to back you up (security, school officials, the police). You can't do it all by yourself with no strength, saying, "Pretty please, don't hurt us, even though we won't let you have what you want." I guess the liberals aren't as brainy as they try to act.

Answer 2

It sure does seems that way. doesn't it? So easily they forget about 9/11. Sure we have troops dieing in Iraq/ Afganistan, but thats why they are in the military, to be a solider. I was in the Army, I did my job(kosovo). And that had little to do with U.S. affairs. Now, since 9/11, the middle east is a nest egg for radicals. We have to have a presence there or else more horrific terrorist attacks will happen here and abroad. But the liberals don't see it that way. They see it as us loosing lives, the media doesn't help with this. If we left Iraq now, not only would it be a terrorist heaven, but I'm sure Iran would instill some kinda of Iatolla government there. That would be a major shortcoming for the U.S. But people like to see things through blind eyes.

Answer 3

Radical Muslims and Western Society? I doubt that!
Too many differences of beliefs and opinions. Bottom line, all want the power to control the universe. The clash will continue.

Answer 4

Whether they consciously know it or not, Liberals are joining forces with the Islama fascists.

Back in the early days of Soviet communism, Lenin referred to the naive American Liberals as "Useful Idiots". Now, the same term applies to the Liberals who don't realize that their "anti-war" demonstrations are the only change the terrorists have of winning the war. Al-Zarkawi actually said so. He implored his followers to just keep causing havoc because he knew that eventually, Americans would pull their support for the war, and they'd win by default.

Read the website below!

Answer 5

Anything to undercut President Bush and our troops.
They want to cut off funding to the troops as a way to force their will.
How would you like a be a soldier and have the politicians dragging you down, threatening your support and telling you it's a wasted effort.
These jerks make me sick.

Answer 6

Not joining forces so much as making common cause. They both have the same primary goal, namely to destroy the President by any means possible. Liberals actually believe his will not harm the country but simply pave the way for them to take back the White House. Sort of like the Brits who chided Churchill for antagonizing the Germans because it was so clear that nice Mr. Hitler just wanted peace.

Answer 7

Wow.. You have been listening entirely to much to Hannity, Rush, Savage and the like. I am liberal and dont know any other liberals who are "joining forces" with extreme religious groups.

Tom, you are delusional.

Answer 8

They will become a member of 3 organizations First the only at the back of it the entire Catholic church that desires the political vigor again, Secound the Islamic religion that's a pegan faith just like the catholic ( Not different christians simply catholics), and the secreat societies which can be ruled by way of them. That is who they'll become a member of. Not to say the United Nations and the United Religious Oragnisation. BTW who proposal of seeking to convey in combination the entire countries whilst God seprated them on the tower of bable within the first situation.

Answer 9

I heard this in 1968. It did not work then. It will not work now. We lost 58,000 because of intolerance and ignorance in Viet Nam. The occupation of Iraq needs to end. Why do you blame "Liberals" for Bush and Republicans who refused to take Powell's advice and have a exit plan? Why do you blame "Liberals" for Bush ignoring the warning he was given by PDB before Sept. 11th?

Answer 10

Are Rush Limpwang and Sean Hanutty right? About everything? Man, why didn't I realize that sooner.