No, but I fear the changes envisioned by the Democrats. Welfare state, nationalized health, economy-killing taxes, class-warfare, assault on corporations, and other dangers to freedom and liberty.
I vote more to prevent such things than to seek change. Until a viable 3rd party comes along that believes in the returning us the freedoms and liberties that were our birthright, I'll vote against the radical changes the Dems seek.
2007-02-09 04:09:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Change is very slow for a lot of reasons. Usually when the Prez is one party, congress majority leans the other direction. This is a good balance of power, but does make serious change a slow process.
2007-02-09 03:51:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by John L 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If I were currently in power and wanted to stay there, I would do my very best to instill a sense of apathy in those who could change the status quo.
Real change takes hard work and commitment. A lack of both are what those bastards in Washington are counting on.
Who else is tired of this crap?
2007-02-09 03:59:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Hippies grew up ... and are voting for the same old stuff ---> give us drugs (pain pills instead of pot) ... baby killers (abortion) ... and dividing the country by bashing military people.
Scarier part is the Hippie kids are next in power --- right around the corner. God only knows what they stand for.
2007-02-09 04:04:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Giggly Giraffe 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm voting Bugs Bunny '08. The mainstream republican vs. democrat game has gone out of style, especially since they've become practically indistinguishable. Borrow-and-spend vs. tax-and-spend, why choose between two evils anymore?
2007-02-09 04:03:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, change, 2 quarters, 3 dimes, 1 nickel, 5 pennies, that's the change, I've seen change.
2007-02-09 03:51:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Baw 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I expect nothing to change as long as we are slaves to the two party paradigm. The two mainstream parties want nothing more than to keep the money rolling in and to keep the power that they have since they have been in office so long.
2007-02-09 04:06:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not at all. Both sides point at shortcomings, but neither offer any solutions. I was hoping for a candidate that could restore the American people's faith in it's government. But so far, nothing on the horizon.
2007-02-09 03:51:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
All I know is that I am much better off during this Repubican administration's stay than I was during the Clinton era. The economy is booming right now. Even though I hate that we are at war, overall people are spending money and that is what keeps the economy going....like it or not.
2007-02-09 03:51:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No, their all paid off. I'd personally like to see about the whole bunch canned. Time for new blood. ( Comming from a hippie who isn't on pain killers or anything else.) They sure don't represent me.
2007-02-09 04:10:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋