2007-02-09 03:39:56 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
The POPE , PETER JENNINGS and SISTER THRESA didn't even get as much coverage as ANNA NICHOLE SMITH is getting!
VERY SHAMEFULL INDEED!!!
2007-02-09 03:41:26 · update #1
And.........YES........I will quit WATCHING and BUYING ANYTHING that these CHANNELS PROMOTE!
2007-02-09 04:21:46 · update #2
Thank you "bubu"! I will take your advise!
2007-02-09 07:00:01 · update #3
And, YES "bubu" you are the one RESPONSIBLE for MILLIONS of AMERICANS not watching CNN, MSNBC & FOX CHANNEL and NOT buying the PRODUCTS that they PROMOTED!
Thank you again........."bubu"
2007-02-09 07:04:13 · update #4
E-MAIL "bubu" whenever you please because "bubu's" is going to jail!
2007-02-09 07:05:40 · update #5
Rumor has it........?
2007-02-09 07:11:14 · update #6
If it offends you don't watch.
2007-02-09 03:47:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Important public figure such as Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa are honored in a different more permanent ways, They will be made saints and be well know and respected long after people forget who Anna Nichole is.
As I recall their was much more publicty when Pope John Paul II died, the story went several weeks, First he was sick, then he was dying, then he died, then their was a public funeral, and then they had to determine who the new pope was, and then we celebrated a new pope.
Here is why the Anna Nichole Smith story is so hot.
1:She is a minor celebrity people like celebrity news.
2:Death under mysterious circumstances, people like a good mystery.
3:She was an attractive woman, people like those.
4:She is a train wreck and people always stare and look at those.
The story has the potential to explode, with court cases resolving her finances, the parentage of her child, the circustances behind her death, The still unresolved matter of her son's death.
2007-02-09 04:02:35 · answer #2 · answered by Vultureman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
... and what are the rankings at the same time as 3 generic people discuss taxation with out props, circus carnival acts and hysterics? An embarrassing freak educate attracts a crowd of drooling slackjawed onlookers. Yeah, it truly is a real shocker. Who ought to have guessed? ... and this you concentration on grounds for boasting about the accomplishments of your reason? in case you have not talked about, each thing continuously expenditures you one hundred%. If taxes account for 15%, meaning inner most corporation is taking eighty 5% of each thing of fee you ever earn or make a contribution. Are you planning on throwing teabags at them next? Are you 5.666 cases better furious with inner most corporation? the concentration on that 15% in hardship-free words emphasizes the glaring stupidity required to miss the different eighty 5%, and the in hardship-free words element better embarrassing than it really is your conceited delight in such huge stupidity.
2016-12-03 22:59:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Controversy sells. Paid media venues need ratings too b/c none of them are unbiased and all of them are bought by the highest bidder, why do you think they are in competition with one another? If they were all telling unbiased truths and regaling witness accounts, there would be one station that just distributed news, and stations like NBC, ABC, Fox and everyone else would have no place for a news hour. Seems to me like the media scheme worked on you. they need people who will praise the works of their subjects, and their own actions to be constantly countered by people who are appalled by them, so they can stay in the swing of things. Congrats puppet, you have just given them the power! But don't feel bad, I myself have been in this position before, in fact everyone on this site has at one point or another been the unwitting yet compliant pawn of the press. Good luck staying above peace and GOD bless!
2007-02-09 04:15:06 · answer #4 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm tempted to stop watching until she's buried, memmorialized, docu-drama'd, etc. It saddens me to see the likes of Joe Scarborough & Keith Olbermann forced to cover this kind of crap. Their audience is much better served when they are allowed to cover relevant issues in this world. For MSNBC, I'm blaming Dan Abraham--this kind of crap became more prevalent after he got his promotion to some kine of big shot on MSNBC.
2007-02-09 04:00:39 · answer #5 · answered by catcha22 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She was a celebrity of sorts and, as her son dieds not so long ago. this may be more than just a drug user dying. It could be a double murder case.
2007-02-09 03:49:14 · answer #6 · answered by Arizona Brit 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am interested in knowing what happened. We do not know what happened like with the others so it draws your interest. Plus with everything that has been going on in her life recently it makes for a good story.
2007-02-09 03:57:06 · answer #7 · answered by Kim 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She's a celebrity. Celebs are a big deal here in the West.
2007-02-09 03:48:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think that we all have or own opinions on this story line. But she was a caleb. even tho some of us think different!!!
2007-02-09 03:57:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So they can avoid talking about real news, like US war crimes.
2007-02-09 04:37:46 · answer #10 · answered by freddyderf55 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree.
If it wasn't for her money - she'd just be another lowlife white trash ho who died because of her choice of lifestyle.
2007-02-09 04:10:42 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋