No WMDs. No Iraq-9/11 connection. Our own intelligence community admits that Bush's War is creating more terrorism than it is eliminating. Polling data indicates that the Iraqis want us out of their country. Fewer than one-in-three Americans supports the war.
Isn't this really all about Mr. Bring-It-On's adolescent male ego than it is about the people of Iraq or protecting America?
2007-02-09 03:20:46 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, yes! Everything you have noted is indeed true. It came out on Thursday that a report from the Defense Department's Inspector General indicated that the intelligence information was purposefully manipulated to gin up the Iraq war of choice.
I am so sick of people saying that Congress authorized war. They did not, Bush and his co-horts went in front of Congress and said that they would use diplomatic solutions and inspections first and that use of force would be a last resort and they would come back to the Congress. They lied. They went straight to war and manipulated the hell out of sketchy intelligence to support their world view.
Congress did not squawk back because as soon as they did, their patriotism was called into question as was done to them after 9/11. When the lack of a connection between Saddam and al Qaeda was emphasized, attack dog Cheney still kept on saying there was because he knew there are enough people out there that would still believe him even if they read it was a lie. A case of " believe me or your lying eyes"
2007-02-09 03:39:07 · answer #1 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because of the fact somebody has a e book popping out on the region does no longer make it fake. listed right here are a pair to envision out: Rumsfeld: His upward thrust, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy. Scott McClellan: What got here about: interior the Bush White residing house and Washington's subculture of Deception.
2016-11-02 23:47:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you ever once heard the word "occupation" on any "liberal" news? Ever see the word "occupation" in the "liberal" press? Have you ever heard Rush L. use that word? Has Glenn Beck ever used that word? Now you know what PC is and does. I see you read.
Congress approved the search for WMDs and the removal of Saddam by force. Congress never approved the occupation of Iraq.
The failure that Conservatives will never admit to is Bush's failure to have a exit plan. Bush was told by Powell he needed that, Bush ignored Powell. Another failure the Republicans will never admit to was that Bush was warned about the attack on America before Sept. 11th. he also ignored that warning.
2007-02-09 03:33:06 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let’s try Congress's war!!!!!! Voted by congress - passed by congress. Have you personally searched Iraq for WMD? Be honest here how many times have you mis-placed something & searched & searched for it but still could not find it? We are talking about a whole country with many-many hiding places - just because they have not found them does not mean they do not exist. And furthermore what do you call chemical weapons (?) last time I checked they were WMD, they were used against our troops during the first GULF WAR please get your facts straight. Thank you & have a nice day!
2007-02-09 03:31:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How about calling it a war to protect the country that we all live and prosper in? A war to protect the citizens of the greatest country in the world? A war to ensure that terrorists do not kill 3000 citizens in a single day again? Any of those titles are accurate.
2007-02-09 03:31:46 · answer #5 · answered by fretzdawg 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You got that right. Do you think Bush would stay over in Iraq to protect His Country ? I think we all know the answer to that...
2007-02-09 03:40:34 · answer #6 · answered by Jean f 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, the most appropriate would be Bush's Oil-Grab-Genocide. Or Formally, it could be called Bush's Genocidal Crime for the Iraqi Oil Grab!
2007-02-09 03:42:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Liberals have been referring to this as Bush's war ever since they decided they were against it, after they voted for it. Accurate is calling it our war, and just getting it done.
2007-02-09 03:25:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You obviously have no clue about the war in Iraq. Pretty soon you will be saying this war is over oil. Pretty pathetic.
This is not Bush's war. Congress voted 100% to go to war.
2007-02-09 03:29:28 · answer #9 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
That is the way most of America sees it, so yes I agree with you.
2007-02-09 03:44:16 · answer #10 · answered by Earl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋