2007-02-09 03:13:37 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
More like Hunger Management issues.
2007-02-10 02:06:31 · answer #1 · answered by da 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, silly. Hannibal Lecter didn't kill because he was angry, he killed because he liked it. He is a classic psychopath, not a person suffering from an antisocial personality disorder. Psychopaths generally have a normal level of control over their mood and understand right from wrong. They just don't empathise with others or feel guilt. Read some of Robert Hare's research.
2007-02-09 17:03:53 · answer #2 · answered by queenbee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not if you believe anger to be the loss of control. Control was certainly something he had in abundance, that coupled with his patience and intellect made him incredibly dangerous. His anger to me seemed meticulously well managed.
2007-02-09 11:26:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, he manages his anger OK, really. I mean, Clarice still has her face after three, or is it four, remakes. I think you're being a bit harsh.
2007-02-09 14:05:11 · answer #4 · answered by steveb9458 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He just likes eating human flesh. He's quite a charming guy actually, but had a very traumatic childhood.
2007-02-09 11:19:38 · answer #5 · answered by celianne 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was just hungry and there wasn't a McDonalds close by. I get mad when that happens, so he made flesh burgers. SGRS
2007-02-09 11:18:44 · answer #6 · answered by stoneground001 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More like an eating disorder!
2007-02-09 14:12:31 · answer #7 · answered by Mimi 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ya think? LOL I'd say he's got a lot of issues.
2007-02-09 11:20:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol.
maybe he was just having a bad day.
2007-02-09 11:18:30 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly, I am also concerned about his diet!!
2007-02-09 11:25:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋