Bring Harold back, ESPN!!! He is the man.
He must've done something pretty bad for ESPN to get rid of such a "web gem". Can't be as bad as Kobe, Barry, or any of those other criminals they cover...
2007-02-09 08:51:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Reynolds absolutely got a raw deal and while I'm not a lawyer, I think common sense says he'll win his lawsuit against ESPN. But remember that sexual harassment is a far scarier issue in the workplace than drugs. Companies are absolutely scared of that crap. Did you know that if you tell a dirty joke to someone, and someone listens in without your knowledge, and gets offended, that could be considered sexual harassment? Hence why Harold Reynolds got fired, and why Michael Irvin still has a job at ESPN.
2007-02-09 23:21:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by impftgenius 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he's been treated pretty terribly by ESPN considering there are people working for that company who have been convicted of certain things in a criminal case. There has been no criminal complaint made against Harold Reynolds and he seems to of been sacked on the word of one person, which is great grounds for unfair dismissal.
He has already launched a lawsuit against the company and I'd be stunned if he didn't win.
2007-02-09 12:54:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by NM 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I heard rumors what happened, but who am I to judge? I love reynolds and hope he someday comes back, but as long as Gammons is still going I'm happy. Go Red Sox!
2007-02-10 16:25:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Adam A 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I think he got a raw deal.
2007-02-09 11:05:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by gman 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
HE WAS MESSED OVER AND HE SHOULD BE FILING A LAW SUIT.
2007-02-09 12:38:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by smitty 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I agree w/Keith.
2007-02-09 15:27:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by avcons 3
·
0⤊
0⤋