Um... Global Warming, hands down. Bin Laden is one human, and going to die on his own eventually, he has kidney problems as it is. I give him 5 more years tops.
Global Warming is an ongoing process that holds billions of people and thier decendant's lives in its hands. It needs to be addressed, now or soon, or the entire world will be in kaos from floods and famine and whatever else. ( look at the problems displacement caused New Orleans and Houston after Katrina)
Killing Bin Laden, although seemingly satisfactory, will not end terrorism by Al Quida. If anything, it will fuel the fire and create many more crazies just like him or worse. So then.. in the future, not only will we have to worry about exterme climate changes and natural disasters, we will have to deal with multiple homicial, american hating, mini-bin ladens.
P.S The Bush Administration has already spent well over $100 billion fighting the war on terror, and yet... still no Bin Laden.
Just a dead guy who tried to kill Bush Sr. and a civil war and more and more children growing up to hate america.
2007-02-09 02:54:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden is in Hawaii? I didn't know that? If I KNEW Bin Laden was in Hawaii I'd be on the next flight there. I could use the $25 Million. Especially if I could do it BEFORE the Democrats get back to taxing the rich. Of course with $25 Million I probably could find some good tax attorney to find me some shelter.
You do know Global Warming does exist. It's been existing since the end of the last Ice Age? I wonder if Al want's us to go back to when most of the US was covered by glaciers?
2007-02-09 02:39:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gore's prize is less attainable, but the actions involved would prove more beneficial. The United States could easily find Bin Laden if it wanted to. Bin Laden might be of further use to America though, so we won't try as hard. But it would be easier than coming up with a method that could be applied that would stop global warming. That's a front Bush is putting up, we don't need vigilantes with keen eyesight to find Bin Laden, if we really wanted to get rid of him, we could pin-point his exact location, and go in and kidnap him bring him back to the states and put him back on the CIA payroll again and no one would ever figure it out on either side if we used half the technology at our disposal.
For being more useful, and more easily achieved I'd take Gore's money. But what do I know, I'd take half of that for doing nothing. GOD knows I'm not rich!
2007-02-09 02:35:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rick R 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
So if we add it all up what do we get. Lets go and find Bin La din get 25 million bucks because global warming can not be stopped.
I've never been to Hawaii and need to top up my tan. Did you know Richard Bransen (Virgin ) is offering 25 million pounds to help stop global warming he won't be out of pocket any time soon.
2007-02-09 03:27:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush does have many useful ideas and getting rid of Bin Laden is one of them!
2007-02-09 03:17:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Starla_C 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK, Al Gore offers it eh? So I guess you'll have to smoke a lot of cigarettes to help him make up for that amount right? You do know that all of his money was made from tobacco sales don't you?
BTW, OBL was killed at Tora Bora in the first major bombing in Afghanistan and that's why he hasn't been see sense except in the old photos of him. But then, you won't believe someone who knows about pictures and can use there eyes, you just want to believe the BS from some other idiot so you can spread his BS.
2007-02-09 02:38:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
i'm also prepared to guess that Bin encumbered thinks that oxygen is significant for human beings to exist. Are you in that particular same cave? uncomplicated beliefs do no longer make human beings "kin individuals" by any potential. I mean i'm prepared to guess that i will discover 25 conservatives that could want to accept as true with me - a liberal - on the choose of water to the planet. doesn't make us like ideologically. @Coriolan. . . Hitler believed that HE change into descended from Gods, and that he change into the in uncomplicated words God to worship. So he and Christians did no longer have an entire hell of lots in uncomplicated in any respect. . .
2016-10-17 06:12:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
bob finds it funny that all the people here say global warming is nothing and rather kill bin ladin, but they keep screaming that the war in the middle east is pointless and are probobly the same people who said killing saddam did nothing.
bob would probobly rather have global warming dead, cause bob is young so global warming is gonna be bobs problem when bob is older.
2007-02-10 07:39:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
$25mm is better spent to get Bin Laden and killing radical muslims. Other countries have a responsibity for the environment as. It's not only our problem.
2007-02-09 02:31:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mr. Marbles 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
Throwing dollars (in any incremental amount) will not eliminate or solve the 'problems' inherent with either . . . especially since one is a condition and the other a human.
2007-02-09 02:41:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋