We can prove Iran's involvement in Iraq, you libs want to run, or confront who's been killing our troops?

Answer 1

And Russian HAS admitted to removing all WMD from Iraq just prior to our getting there, but the liberal, left-wing, pinko press won't print that. Strange, THEY are the first ones the terrorists will shoot it we are taken over, but the press doesn't seem to realize that.

Answer 2

The "proof" claimed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates is pathetic. Gates said, "I think there's some serial numbers, there may be some markings on some of the projectile fragments that we found," that point to Iran. He THINKS? There MAY BE? And later, will he be saying "I didn't LIE -I never said there WAS for sure."? Gates also said Iran is "very much involved in providing either the technology or the weapons themselves for these explosively formed projectiles. Now they don't represent a big percentage of the IED attacks but they're extremely lethal." Either/or? So the serial numbers are on "technology"? Hmm.

I think the US must fight the Iranians in Iraq. In a bigger war, Iran can try to cut the supply lines to Iraq. You are sure they will fail, I am not. I think they will at least partly succeed.

Answer 3

fairly there isn't any information on the 'information' approximately what's occurring in Iraq. at times you spot that sought after action picture clip showing the comparable marines breaking down the comparable door and then there is that previous buzz approximately how we killed the type 2 guy. each at times some prevalent gets onTV and say how nicely each little thing is going, yet you're able to be certian he has his arms crossed in the back of his decrease back whilst he's asserting it. In actual existence the 'Vichy Iraq' government has no actual authority, little or no capability and for the main area it is staffed via hacks hiding out in fortress green Zone hoping that they might dodge the subsequent incoming mortar around. The actual infrastructure of Iraq is total #$%$, in simple terms approximately all the knowledgeable anyone is the two in another usa or hiding out hundreds of miles from the place they used to stay decrease than assumed names. there is fewer killings via fact in simple terms approximately everyon slated to be killed is already lifeless. The sunnis are being bribed with borrowed US forex to no longer shoot at our troops. The shiites are waiting for the U. S. to flow away so that they might wipe out the sunnis and the so observed as Iraqi defense force are ineffective. meanwhile the U. S. taxpayer is staring on the Bush Junta borrow further and extra money to maintain this crackpot concept going and the GOP needs previous guy McCain to %. up the place George Bush leaves off. anyone is killed and maimed everyday for no longer something. whilst this began our forces grew to grow to be mercenaries for the Oil Mafia and none of that has replaced. Iraqi oil became meant to pay for all of this mess and the U. S. became meant to be 'safer'. that did no longer take place. the enormous question is...why interior the hell hasn't Bush and something of his posse of degenerate reactionaries been arrested, charge, convicted and despatched up? Oh, nicely...that throughout the time of all probability does no longer have made the 'information' the two.

Answer 4

It is the conservatives that continue the illusion of loss in Iraq. The truth is that we won. The goal of ending the regime od=f Saddam Hussein was realized long ago. The power vacuum created opened the door to Iran and Syria and anybody else that wants to fill the void. All that held them back was the Saddam Hussein regime. This is not a liberal view. In fact, it is far more conservative than any of the self-titled conservatives' views. Leaving Iraq would not be "cutting and running". Leaving would be allowing the Iraqis to govern themselves~the ultimate goal of our involvement in the first place. Iranians or anybody else cannot kill anyone who is not there to be killed.

Answer 5

If a foreign army invaded the US in order say to force it to stop having WMD (nuclear weapons), what would you do? I think you would - and should - resist and kill the invaders. You would have the right and the duty to do it. So the Iraqis are doing the same in their country.

By the way, Saddam's regime, tyrannic as it may have been, it was an enemy of Iran. Now thanks to US Saddam is gone and the Iran-friendly Shiites are taking over, so they unite with Iran against the US. At least, in Saddam's days, Iran had less power, because Iraq was a strong enemy by its door.

Answer 6

Confront them in IRAQ not in Iran. You think we got problems now, attack Iran and you ain't seen nothing yet. War mongers need to try a little diplomacy but they don't they would rather bully other sovereign nations.

Answer 7

The Bush government has been asked for the proof of Iran's involvement and has since backed down from those claims.

Instead of blindly believing what you are told about what is going on over there, perhaps you should demand proof before we send our soldiers in harms way.

If we had demanded to see the proof of weapons of mass destruction, our troops wouldn't be getting killed.

Answer 8

Just one more effect of us invading when we shouldn't have. Its is another effect of piss poor leadership and execution of the war.

You people are friggin' clueless. We wouldn't be having these problems had we not invaded and maintained the policy of containment. The Iranians were willing to play ball and work things out before the war. After we invaded, as usual the Bush people told them to get f'ed.

One more issue to consider-- those missiles taking out our helicopters? Well, they are obviously getting way better trained people in the field now. To be good enough with a missile to take out a helicopter takes training. Hmm, could it be that part of the missing $9bb in lost money went to training terrorist?

Answer 9

I assume you are writing from a foxhole somewhere or the battlefield????

Put your money where your mouth is and go join up. The military will be happy to send your butt off to help protect our troops in Iraq.

Answer 10

i'm sure you have seen the proof. more like read what they want you to believe in the media. sad fact is iraq has had us allied with some strange people and groups. as did afghanistan and pakistan. iran helped us overthrow the taliban and now pakistan is helping the taliban. don't believe the media 100%,we seldom get the whole truth/story. we won't invade iran.

Answer 11

I think liberals are all really ecstatic about the fact that Bush has now made it possible for Iran to push its way into Iraq and kill our troops.